JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online November 15, 2007, 10.2967/jnumed.107.045443
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jnumed.107.045443v1
48/12/2080    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JNM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gulec, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Siegel, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gulec, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Siegel, J. A.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 48 No. 12 2080-2086
© 2007 by Society of Nuclear Medicine

doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.045443

Special Contribution

Posttherapy Radiation Safety Considerations in Radiomicrosphere Treatment with 90Y-Microspheres

Seza A. Gulec1 and Jeffry A. Siegel1,2

1 Center for Cancer Care, Goshen Health System, Goshen, Indiana; and 2 Nuclear Physics Enterprises, Marlton, New Jersey

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Seza A. Gulec, MD, Department of Nuclear Oncology, Center for Cancer Care, Goshen Health System, 200 High Park Ave., Goshen, IN 46526. E-mail: sgulec{at}goshenhealth.com

Radiomicrosphere treatment involves the intrahepatic arterial administration of 90Y-resin or 90Y-glass microspheres. The microspheres are biocompatible, but not biodegradable, and little to no 90Y leaches from the microspheres. Without any bioelimination, the β-dose delivery is generally confined to the liver. Although U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission requirements permit patients treated with these microspheres to be released without the need for dose determination or patient instructions, there are important radiation safety issues that need scientific clarification. We carefully evaluated the radiation exposure mechanisms, including the bremsstrahlung radiation doses to others, for a variety of lifestyle behaviors. Dose estimates were also made for several practical and theoretic situations involving the patient's gonads, an embryo or fetus, and a nursing infant. For the infant, we evaluated the potential β-dose that might be introduced via breast milk ingestion. The bremsstrahlung component of the decay scheme of the pure β-emitter 90Y has traditionally been ignored in internal and external dose calculations. Because the production of in vivo bremsstrahlung with the high-energy pure β-particle–emitting radionuclides used for therapeutic purposes is sufficient to permit external detection and imaging, we believe that the contribution of such radiation should be considered with regard to patient release; we therefore chose to evaluate this potential external radiation hazard. In all cases, the estimated doses were very small, indicating that no patient restrictions are required for radiation safety purposes after the release of a patient who has been treated with 90Y-microspheres.

Key Words: radiomicrosphere treatment • 90Y • microspheres • radiation safety • selective internal radiation treatment

COPYRIGHT © 2007 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.


Related articles in JNM:

This Month in JNM

JNM 2007 48: 11A-12A. [Full Text]  






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2007 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.