JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pandit-Taskar, N.
Right arrow Articles by Divgi, C. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pandit-Taskar, N.
Right arrow Articles by Divgi, C. R.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 47 No. 7 1202-1208
© 2006 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Basic Science Investigation

Organ and Fetal Absorbed Dose Estimates from 99mTc-Sulfur Colloid Lymphoscintigraphy and Sentinel Node Localization in Breast Cancer Patients

Neeta Pandit-Taskar1, Lawrence T. Dauer2, Leslie Montgomery3, Jean St. Germain2, Pat B. Zanzonico2 and Chaitanya R. Divgi1

1 Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; 2 Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; and 3 Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Lawrence T. Dauer, PhD, Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., New York, NY 10021. E-mail: dauerl{at}mskcc.org

The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine whether lymphoscintigraphy (LSG) for sentinel lymph node (SNL) mapping in a woman with a breast mass presents an unacceptable risk to her fetus. We assessed radiation-absorbed dose to various organs from 99mTc-sulfur colloid (TSC) LSG using standard internal absorbed dose assessment methodologies for both reference phantoms as well as for phantom models using the specific patient population characteristics such as total body and injected organ mass. The study also projected the radiation-absorbed dose to the fetus from LSG for SLN mapping. Methods: Data from 1,021 nonpregnant women with early-stage breast cancer who underwent SLN mapping and biopsy procedures were analyzed. Patients had a single-site intradermal injection of unfiltered TSC in 0.05 mL normal saline: 3.7 MBq (0.1 mCi) on the morning of surgery (1-d protocol) or 18.5 MBq (0.5 mCi) on the afternoon before surgery (2-d protocol). A standard internal dose calculation methodology was used to calculate absorbed doses to various organs and to a modeled fetus at 3-, 6-, and 9-mo gestation from the injection site as well as from systemic activity. Results: The highest estimated absorbed doses were observed for the reference 9-mo-pregnant model under the 2-d protocol. Absorbed doses of 14.9, 0.214, 0.062, 0.151, 0.004, 0.163, 0.075, and 0.014 mGy were received by the injected breast, heart, liver, lung, ovaries, thymus, total body, and fetus, respectively. Effective doses from the 2-d protocol were estimated to be 0.460, 0.186, and 0.245 mSv for the reference population, the total Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) study patient population, and childbearing-age MSKCC patient population (i.e., <45 y old), respectively. Conclusion: SLN procedures lead to a negligible dose to the fetus of 0.014 mGy or less. This is much less than the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements limit to a pregnant woman. Calculations using actual patient population characteristics resulted in lower organ dose estimates than more conservative reference models.

Key Words: breast cancer • lymphoscintigraphy • sentinel lymph node mapping • absorbed dose




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
radtechHome page
J. MINIGH
Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping of the Breast
Radiol. Technol., January 1, 2008; 79(3): 243M - 257M.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2006 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.