JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yuan, H.
Right arrow Articles by Dewhirst, M. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yuan, H.
Right arrow Articles by Dewhirst, M. W.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 47 No. 6 989-998
© 2006 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Basic Science Investigation

Intertumoral Differences in Hypoxia Selectivity of the PET Imaging Agent 64Cu(II)-Diacetyl-Bis(N4-Methylthiosemicarbazone)

Hong Yuan1, Thies Schroeder1, James E. Bowsher2,3, Laurence W. Hedlund2,3, Terence Wong2 and Mark W. Dewhirst1

1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; 2 Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; and 3 Center for In Vivo Microscopy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Mark W. Dewhirst, DVM, PhD, Room 201 MSRB, Research Dr., Duke University Medical Center, Box 3455 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710. E-mail: dewhirst{at}radonc.duke.edu

Cu-Diacetyl-bis(N4-methylthiosemicarbazone) (Cu-ATSM) is a recently developed PET imaging agent for tumor hypoxia. However, its accuracy and reliability for measuring hypoxia have not been fully characterized in vivo. The aim of this study was to evaluate 64Cu-ATSM as a hypoxia PET marker by comparing autoradiographic distributions of 64Cu-ATSM with a well-established hypoxia marker drug, EF5. Methods: R3230 mammary adenocarcinomas (R3230Ac), fibrosarcomas (FSA), and 9L gliomas (9L) were used in the study. EF5 and Hoechst 33342, a vascular perfusion marker, were administered to the animal for immunohistochemical analysis. 64Cu-ATSM microPET and autoradiography were performed on the same animal. The tumor-to-muscle ratio (T/M ratio) and standardized uptake values (SUVs) were characterized for these 3 different types of tumors. Five types of images—microPET, autoradiography, EF5 immunostaining, Hoechst fluorescence vascular imaging, and hematoxylin-and-eosin histology—were superimposed, evaluated, and compared. Results: A significantly higher T/M ratio and SUV were seen for FSA compared with R3230Ac and 9L. Spatial correlation analysis between 64Cu-ATSM autoradiography and EF5 immunostained images varied between the 3 tumor types. There was close correlation of 64Cu-ATSM uptake and hypoxia in R3230Ac and 9L tumors but not in FSA tumors. Interestingly, elevated 64Cu-ATSM uptake was observed in well-perfused areas in FSA, indicating a correlation between 64Cu-ATSM uptake and vascular perfusion as opposed to hypoxia. The same relationship was observed with 2 other hypoxia markers, pimonidazole and carbonic anhydrase IX, in FSA tumors. Breathing carbogen gas significantly decreased the hypoxia level measured by EF5 staining in FSA-bearing rats but not the uptake of 64Cu-ATSM. These results indicate that some other 64Cu-ATSM retention mechanisms, as opposed to hypoxia, are involved in this type of tumor. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this study is the first comparison between 64Cu-ATSM uptake and immunohistochemistry in these 3 tumors. Although we have shown that 64Cu-ATSM is a valid PET hypoxia marker in some tumor types, but not for all, this tumor type–dependent hypoxia selectivity of 64Cu-ATSM challenges the use of 64Cu-ATSM as a universal PET hypoxia marker. Further studies are needed to define retention mechanisms for this PET marker.

Key Words: tumor hypoxia • PET • Cu-ATSM




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. C. Riedl, P. Brader, P. B. Zanzonico, Y. S. Chun, Y. Woo, P. Singh, S. Carlin, B. Wen, C. C. Ling, H. Hricak, et al.
Imaging Hypoxia in Orthotopic Rat Liver Tumors with Iodine 124-labeled Iodoazomycin Galactopyranoside PET
Radiology, August 1, 2008; 248(2): 561 - 570.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. Takasawa, R. R. Moustafa, and J.-C. Baron
Applications of Nitroimidazole In Vivo Hypoxia Imaging in Ischemic Stroke
Stroke, May 1, 2008; 39(5): 1629 - 1637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. Z. Wong, J. L. Lacy, N. A. Petry, T. C. Hawk, T. A. Sporn, M. W. Dewhirst, and G. Vlahovic
PET of Hypoxia and Perfusion with 62Cu-ATSM and 62Cu-PTSM Using a 62Zn/62Cu Generator
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): 427 - 432.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
D. A. Torigian, S. S. Huang, M. Houseni, and A. Alavi
Functional Imaging of Cancer with Emphasis on Molecular Techniques
CA Cancer J Clin, July 1, 2007; 57(4): 206 - 224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2006 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.