JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reinartz, P.
Right arrow Articles by Buell, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reinartz, P.
Right arrow Articles by Buell, U.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 47 No. 6 968-973
© 2006 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Basic Science Investigation

SPECT Imaging in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism: Automated Detection of Match and Mismatch Defects by Means of Image-Processing Techniques

Patrick Reinartz1, Hans-Juergen Kaiser1, Joachim E. Wildberger2, Cirus Gordji1, Bernd Nowak1 and Ulrich Buell1

1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany; and 2 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Patrick Reinartz, MD, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany. E-mail: reinartz{at}arcor.de

SPECT of ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) lung scans not only improves the diagnostic accuracy of the method but also facilitates the application of advanced image-processing techniques. On the basis of such techniques, our study aimed at developing a procedure that automatically analyzes V/Q lung scans with regard to match and mismatch defects. Methods: Fifty-three patients with suspected pulmonary embolism had lung scans using the SPECT technique as well as 16-slice multidetector-row spiral CT within an interval of 48 h. After iterative image reconstruction and computerized linear registration of the V/Q scans, the ventilation was normalized to the perfusion. For the automated detection of mismatch defects, the perfusion was subtracted from the ventilation, whereas for the detection of match defects, the perfusion was subtracted from the inverted ventilation. Two experienced referees assessed all images. The final diagnosis was made at a consensus meeting while taking into account all of the imaging modalities, laboratory tests, clinical data, and evaluation of a follow-up period. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the conventional visual assessment were 0.91, 0.97, and 0.94, respectively, compared with 0.95, 0.84, and 0.89, respectively, for the automated algorithm. Artifacts imitating mismatch defects in the pulmonary recesses accounted for the relatively low specificity of the automated analysis. Artifacts of that kind were found in 15 patients and led to a false-positive diagnosis in 5 patients. However, by combining the visual and the automated approach, all artifacts could be easily identified leading to a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 0.95, 1.0, and 0.98, respectively. Additionally, in all 12 patients of the cohort with highly heterogeneous ventilation and perfusion, the automated analysis made correct diagnoses. Conclusion: Because of the 3-dimensional properties of the SPECT data, the analysis of lung scans can be automated and objectified. The algorithm produces images that are easy to read and well suited for demonstration. Because of artifacts in the pulmonary recesses introduced by the automated approach, its diagnostic accuracy does not reach the level of the conventional analysis yet. Could these artifacts be overcome, the efficiency of the automated algorithm would be at least equivalent to that of conventional image interpretation. At present, best results can be achieved by combining both approaches.

Key Words: pulmonary embolism • lung scan • SPECT • image processing • image registration




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J. Haller, D. Hyde, N. Deliolanis, R. de Kleine, M. Niedre, and V. Ntziachristos
Visualization of pulmonary inflammation using noninvasive fluorescence molecular imaging
J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2008; 104(3): 795 - 802.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
B. Harris, D. Bailey, S. Miles, E. Bailey, K. Rogers, P. Roach, P. Thomas, M. Hensley, and G. G. King
Objective Analysis of Tomographic Ventilation-Perfusion Scintigraphy in Pulmonary Embolism
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 1, 2007; 175(11): 1173 - 1180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2006 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.