|
|
|||||||||
Basic Science Investigation |
1 Division of Nuclear Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 2 Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 3 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 4 Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 5 Department of Radiation Oncology, The Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 6 Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and 7 Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Raymond M. Reilly, PhD, Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, 19 Russell St., Toronto, Ontario M5S 2S2, Canada. E-mail: raymond.reilly{at}utoronto.ca
Our objective was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, normal tissue distribution, radiation dosimetry, and toxicology of human epidermal growth factor (hEGF) labeled with 111In (111In-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid [DTPA]-hEGF) in mice and rabbits. Methods: 111In-DTPA-hEGF (3.6 MBq; 1.3 or 13 µg) was administered intravenously to BALB/c mice. The blood concentrationtime data were fitted to a 3-compartment model. Acute toxicity was studied with female BALB/c mice at 42 times the maximum planned human dose (MBq/kg) or with New Zealand White rabbits at 1 times the maximum planned human dose (MBq/kg) for a phase I clinical trial. Toxicity was evaluated by monitoring body weight, by determination of hematology and clinical biochemistry parameters, and by morphologic examination of tissues. Radiation dosimetry projections in humans were estimated on the basis of the residence times in mice by use of the OLINDA version 1.0 computer program. Results: The largest amounts of radioactivity were taken up by the liver (41.3 ± 7.8 [mean ± SD] percentage injected dose [%ID] at 1 h after injection and decreasing to 4.9 ± 0.3 %ID at 72 h after injection) and kidneys (18.6 ± 0.8 %ID at 1 h and decreasing to 4.5 ± 0.2 %ID at 72 h after injection). 111In-DTPA-hEGF was cleared rapidly from the blood, with a half-life at
-phase of 2.76.2 min and a half-life at ß-phase of 24.036.3 min. The half-life of the long terminal phase could not be accurately determined. The volume of distribution of the central compartment was 340375 mL/kg, and the volume of distribution at steady state was 430685 mL/kg. There was no significant difference in the ratio of body weight at 15 d to pretreatment weight for mice administered 111In-DTPA-hEGF (1.02 ± 0.01) and mice administered unlabeled DTPA-hEGF (1.01 ± 0.01). Erythrocyte, leukocyte, and platelet counts and serum alanine aminotransferase and creatinine levels remained in the normal ranges. No morphologic changes were observed by light microscopy in any of 19 tissues sampled. Minor morphologic changes in the liver were observed by electron microscopy. The projected whole-body dose in humans was 0.19 mSv·MBq1. The projected doses to the liver, kidneys, and lower large intestine were 0.76, 1.82, and 1.12 mSv·MBq1, respectively. Conclusion: 111In-DTPA-hEGF was safely administered to mice and rabbits at multiples of the maximum dose planned for a phase I trial in breast cancer patients.
Key Words: breast cancer 111In-DTPA-hEGF pharmacokinetics toxicology radiation dosimetry
Related articles in JNM:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. TING, C.-H. CHANG, and H.-E. WANG Cancer Nanotargeted Radiopharmaceuticals for Tumor Imaging and Therapy Anticancer Res, October 1, 2009; 29(10): 4107 - 4118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Cai, Z. Chen, K. E. Bailey, D. A. Scollard, R. M. Reilly, and K. A. Vallis Relationship Between Induction of Phosphorylated H2AX and Survival in Breast Cancer Cells Exposed to 111In-DTPA-hEGF J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2008; 49(8): 1353 - 1361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Mankoff, J. M. Link, H. M. Linden, L. Sundararajan, and K. A. Krohn Tumor Receptor Imaging J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2008; 49(Suppl_2): 149S - 163S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | RSS | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |