JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schöder, H.
Right arrow Articles by Wong, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schöder, H.
Right arrow Articles by Wong, R. J.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 47 No. 5 755-762
© 2006 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Clinical Investigation

18F-FDG PET/CT for Detecting Nodal Metastases in Patients with Oral Cancer Staged N0 by Clinical Examination and CT/MRI

Heiko Schöder1, Diane L. Carlson2, Dennis H. Kraus3, Hilda E. Stambuk1, Mithat Gönen4, Yusuf E. Erdi5, Henry W.D. Yeung1, Andrew G. Huvos2, Jatin P. Shah3, Steven M. Larson1 and Richard J. Wong3

1 Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; 2 Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; 3 Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; 4 Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; and 5 Department of Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Heiko Schöder, MD, Department of Radiology/Nuclear Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., Box 77, New York, NY 10021. E-mail: schoderh{at}mskcc.org

18F-FDG PET has a high accuracy in staging head and neck cancer, but its role in patients with clinically and radiographically negative necks (N0) is less clear. In particular, the value of combined PET/CT has not been determined in this group of patients. Methods: In a prospective study, 31 patients with oral cancer and no evidence of lymph node metastases by clinical examination or CT/MRI underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT before elective neck dissection. PET/CT findings were recorded by neck side (left or right) and lymph node level. PET/CT findings were compared with histopathology of dissected nodes, which was the standard of reference. Results: Elective neck dissections (26 unilateral, 5 bilateral; a total of 36 neck sides), involving 142 nodal levels, were performed. Only 13 of 765 dissected lymph nodes harbored metastases. Histopathology revealed nodal metastases in 9 of 36 neck sides and 9 of 142 nodal levels. PET was TP in 6 nodal levels (6 neck sides), false-negative in 3 levels (3 neck sides), true-negative in 127 levels (23 neck sides), and false-positive in 6 levels (4 neck sides). The 3 false-negative findings occurred in metastases smaller than 3 mm or because of inability to distinguish between primary tumor and adjacent metastasis. TP and false-positive nodes exhibited similar standardized uptakes (4.8 ± 1.1 vs. 4.2 ± 1.0; P = not significant). Sensitivity and specificity were 67% and 85% on the basis of neck sides and 67% and 95% on the basis of number of nodal levels, respectively. If a decision regarding the need for neck dissection had been based solely on PET/CT, 3 false-negative necks would have been undertreated, and 4 false-positive necks would have been overtreated. Conclusion: 18F-FDG PET/CT can identify lymph node metastases in a segment of patients with oral cancer and N0 neck. A negative test can exclude metastatic deposits with high specificity. Despite reasonably high overall accuracy, however, the clinical application of PET/CT in the N0 neck may be limited by the combination of limited sensitivity for small metastatic deposits and a relatively high number of false-positive findings. The surgical management of the N0 neck should therefore not be based on PET/CT findings alone.

Key Words: 18F-FDG PET/CT • lymph node metastases • head and neck cancer • N0 neck




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
T. Nakagawa, M. Yamada, and Y. Suzuki
18F-FDG Uptake in Reactive Neck Lymph Nodes of Oral Cancer: Relationship to Lymphoid Follicles
J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2008; 49(7): 1053 - 1059.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
P. A. Kyzas, E. Evangelou, D. Denaxa-Kyza, and J. P. A. Ioannidis
18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography to Evaluate Cervical Node Metastases in Patients With Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-analysis
J Natl Cancer Inst, May 21, 2008; 100(10): 712 - 720.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
A. Quon, N. J. Fischbein, I. R. McDougall, Q.-T. Le, B. W. Loo Jr., H. Pinto, and M. J. Kaplan
Clinical Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the Management of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck and Thyroid Carcinoma
J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2007; 48(1_suppl): 58S - 67S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
J. Czernin, M. Allen-Auerbach, and H. R. Schelbert
Improvements in Cancer Staging with PET/CT: Literature-Based Evidence as of September 2006
J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2007; 48(1_suppl): 78S - 88S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2006 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.