JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JNM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tsukada, H.
Right arrow Articles by Kakiuchi, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tsukada, H.
Right arrow Articles by Kakiuchi, T.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 47 No. 4 679-688
© 2006 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Basic Science Investigation

Evaluation of D-Isomers of O-11C-Methyl Tyrosine and O-18F-Fluoromethyl Tyrosine as Tumor-Imaging Agents in Tumor-Bearing Mice: Comparison with L- and D-11C-Methionine

Hideo Tsukada, PhD, Kengo Sato, MS, Dai Fukumoto, BA, Shingo Nishiyama, MS, Norihiro Harada, MS and Takeharu Kakiuchi, PhD

PET Center, Central Research Laboratory, Hamamatsu Photonics K.K., Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Hideo Tsukada, PhD, PET Center, Central Research Laboratory, Hamamatsu Photonics K.K., 5000 Hirakuchi, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka 434-8601, Japan. E-mail: tsukada{at}crl.hpk.co.jp

The aim of this study was to investigate whether D-amino acid isomers of O-11C-methyl tyrosine (11C-CMT) and O-18F-fluoromethyl tyrosine (18F-FMT) were better than the corresponding L-isomers as tumor- detecting agents with PET in comparison with the difference between L- and D-methyl-11C-methionine (11C-MET). Methods: L- and D-11C-MET, 11C-CMT, and 18F-FMT were injected intravenously into BALB/cA Jcl-nu mice bearing HeLa tumor cells. At 5, 15, 30, and 60 min after injection, normal abdominal organs and xenotransplanted HeLa cells were sampled, and the uptake of each ligand was determined. Metabolic analyses of these compounds in the plasma were also performed. Accumulation of the D-isomers of 11C-MET, 11C-CMT, and 18F-FMT in turpentine-induced inflammatory tissue was assayed in comparison with 18F-FDG. The whole-body distribution of each tracer was imaged with a planar positron imaging system (PPIS). Results: Although the tumor uptake (standardized uptake value [SUV]) levels of the D-isomers of 11C-MET, 11C-CMT, and 18F-FMT were 261%, 72%, and 95% of each L-isomer 60 min after administration, the tumor-to-blood ratios of these D-isomers were 130%, 140%, and 182% of the corresponding L-isomers. In the blood, the D-isomers of these labeled compounds revealed a relatively faster elimination rate compared with their L-isomers, with a high peak uptake in the blood and kidney 5 min after administration. Compared with the natural amino acid ligand L-11C-MET, the uptake of L-isomers of 11C-CMT and 18F-FMT was relatively low and stable in the abdominal organs, whereas D-isomers revealed much lower levels and faster clearance rates compared with corresponding L-isomers. Among the abdominal organs, the pancreas showed a relatively high uptake of 11C-CMT and 18F-FMT; the uptake of these D-isomers was much lower than that of L-isomers. Pretreatment with cycloheximide, a protein synthesis inhibitor, resulted in a marked reduction of L-11C-MET uptake and a slight reduction of D-11C-MET uptake into protein fractions, whereas no significant changes were detected with L- and D-11C-CMT and 18F-FMT. D-Isomers of 11C-MET, 11C-CMT, and 18F-FMT did not accumulate in turpentine-induced inflammatory tissue, where 18F-FDG revealed a high uptake. Whole-body imaging with a PPIS provided consistent distribution data obtained from the tissue dissection analysis. Conclusion: These results suggest that D-isomers of 11C-CMT and 18F-FMT could be potentially better tracers than L- and D-11C-MET for tumor imaging with PET.

Key Words: D-amino acids • 11C-methionine • O-11C-methyl tyrosine • O-18F-fluoromethyl tyrosine • tumor imaging


Related articles in JNM:

This Month in JNM

JNM 2006 47: 9a-10a. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
C. Murayama, N. Harada, T. Kakiuchi, D. Fukumoto, A. Kamijo, A. T. Kawaguchi, and H. Tsukada
Evaluation of D-18F-FMT, 18F-FDG, L-11C-MET, and 18F-FLT for Monitoring the Response of Tumors to Radiotherapy in Mice
J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2009; 50(2): 290 - 295.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
K. Mitsuoka, S. Miyoshi, Y. Kato, Y. Murakami, R. Utsumi, Y. Kubo, A. Noda, Y. Nakamura, S. Nishimura, and A. Tsuji
Cancer Detection Using a PET Tracer, 11C-Glycylsarcosine, Targeted to H+/Peptide Transporter
J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2008; 49(4): 615 - 622.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2006 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.