JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JNM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Breitz, H. B.
Right arrow Articles by Meredith, R. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Breitz, H. B.
Right arrow Articles by Meredith, R. F.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 47 No. 3 534-542
© 2006 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Basic Science Investigation

166Ho-DOTMP Radiation-Absorbed Dose Estimation for Skeletal Targeted Radiotherapy

Hazel B. Breitz, MD1, Richard E. Wendt, III, PhD2, Michael S. Stabin, PhD3, Sui Shen, PhD4, William D. Erwin, MS2, Joseph G. Rajendran, MD5, Janet F. Eary, MD, Lawrence Durack5, Ebrahim Delpassand, MD2, William Martin, MD3 and Ruby F. Meredith, MD4

1 NeoRx Corp., Seattle, Washington; 2 University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; 3 Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee; 4 University of Alabama Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, Alabama; and 5 University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Hazel B. Breitz, MD, NeoRx Corp., 300 Elliott Ave. West, No. 500, Seattle, WA 98119-4115. E-mail: hbreitz{at}neorx.com

166Ho-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetramethylene-phosphonate (DOTMP) is a tetraphosphonate molecule radiolabeled with 166Ho that localizes to bone surfaces. This study evaluated pharmacokinetics and radiation-absorbed dose to all organs from this ß-emitting radiopharmaceutical. Methods: After two 1.1-GBq administrations of 166Ho-DOTMP, data from whole-body counting using a {gamma}-camera or uptake probe were assessed for reproducibility of whole-body retention in 12 patients with multiple myeloma. The radiation-absorbed dose to normal organs was estimated using MIRD methodology, applying residence times and S values for 166Ho. Marrow dose was estimated from measured activity retained after 18 h. The activity to deliver a therapeutic dose of 25 Gy to the marrow was determined. Methods based on region-of-interest (ROI) and whole-body clearance were evaluated to estimate kidney activity, because the radiotracer is rapidly excreted in the urine. The dose to the surface of the bladder wall was estimated using a dynamic bladder model. Results: In clinical practice, {gamma}-camera methods were more reliable than uptake probe–based methods for whole-body counting. The intrapatient variability of dose calculations was less than 10% between the 2 tracer studies. Skeletal uptake of 166Ho-DOTMP varied from 19% to 39% (mean, 28%). The activity of 166Ho prescribed for therapy ranged from 38 to 67 GBq (1,030–1,810 mCi). After high-dose therapy, the estimates of absorbed dose to the kidney varied from 1.6 to 4 Gy using the whole-body clearance–based method and from 8.3 to 17.3 Gy using the ROI-based method. Bladder dose ranged from 10 to 20 Gy, bone surface dose ranged from 39 to 57 Gy, and doses to other organs were less than 2 Gy for all patients. Repetitive administration had no impact on tracer biodistribution, pharmacokinetics, or organ dose. Conclusion: Pharmacokinetics analysis validated {gamma}-camera whole-body counting of 166Ho as an appropriate approach to assess clearance and to estimate radiation-absorbed dose to normal organs except the kidneys. Quantitative {gamma}-camera imaging is difficult and requires scatter subtraction because of the multiple energy emissions of 166Ho. Kidney dose estimates were approximately 5-fold higher when the ROI-based method was used rather than the clearance-based model, and neither appeared reliable. In future clinical trials with 166Ho-DOTMP, we recommend that dose estimation based on the methods described here be used for all organs except the kidneys. Assumptions for the kidney dose require further evaluation.

Key Words: 166Ho-DOTMP • skeletal targeted radiotherapy • radiotherapeutic • dosimetry


Related articles in JNM:

This Month in JNM

JNM 2006 47: 7a-8a. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
M. G. Stabin
Uncertainties in Internal Dose Calculations for Radiopharmaceuticals
J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2008; 49(5): 853 - 860.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
M. Cremonesi, M. Ferrari, L. Bodei, G. Tosi, and G. Paganelli
Dosimetry in Peptide Radionuclide Receptor Therapy: A Review
J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2006; 47(9): 1467 - 1475.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2006 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.