JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JNM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liu, X.
Right arrow Articles by Hnatowich, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liu, X.
Right arrow Articles by Hnatowich, D. J.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 47 No. 2 360-368
© 2006 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Basic Science Investigation

Initial Mechanistic Studies of Antisense Targeting in Cells

Xinrong Liu, PhD, MD1, Kayoko Nakamura, PhD2, Yi Wang, PhD1, Yee Wang, PhD, MD1, Guozheng Liu, PhD1, Jiang He, PhD1, Hongliu Ding, MD3, Peiyuan Lu, PhD3, Mary Rusckowski, PhD1, Atsushi Kubo, MD2 and Donald J. Hnatowich, PhD1,2

1 Department of Radiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts; 2 Department of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; and 3 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Donald J. Hnatowich, PhD, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655. E-mail: donald.hnatowich{at}umassmed.edu

The continued development of antisense targeting will require a better understanding of the mechanism. Methods: We performed initial studies of the mechanism of intracellular antisense targeting through measurements of in situ transcription, immunofluorescence, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), 32P-labeled uridine-5'-triphosphate ({alpha}-32P-UTP) incorporation, nuclear accumulations of 99mTc-labeled DNAs, and messenger RNA (mRNA) transcription rate. As reported earlier, an antisense DNA against the mdr1 mRNA coding for P-glycoprotein (Pgp) and its sense DNA control were used in KB-G2 (Pgp++) cells. Results: Definitive evidence for antisense targeting was obtained by in situ transcription showing complementary DNA elongation in cells exposed to antisense DNA, acting therefore as an intracellular PCR primer of mdr1 mRNA, but not in cells exposed to sense DNA. Immunofluorescence staining showed higher accumulations of antisense versus sense DNAs in KB-G2 cells. Transnuclear migration was confirmed by higher accumulations in the nucleus compared with the cytoplasm in cells incubated with 99mTc-labeled antisense DNA. However, the observed specific accumulations of antisense DNAs of about 106 per cell over 10 h could not be explained by a feedback mechanism upregulating transcription in cells exposed to antisense DNA as no increase in mRNA levels was detected by both RT-PCR and 32P-UTP in these cells. To explore an alternative hypothesis, a novel approach using 99mTc-labeled antisense DNA as a probe of total mRNA from cells previously saturated with unlabeled antisense DNA was used to estimate the transcription rate. Compared with controls, mdr1 mRNA levels were found to be initially low after saturation and to recover at about 2,000 copies per minute per cell. If persistent, this transcription rate would provide 106 mRNAs in 10 h. Conclusion: The results of all studies are consistent with antisense as the mechanism of targeting. Though a feedback mechanism leading to upregulation of mRNA transcription is an unlikely explanation for the high specific accumulations, our results may be explained if antisense DNAs are targeting mdr1 mRNAs produced at high transcription rates. If the target is primarily pre-mRNA in the nucleus rather than mature mRNA in the cytoplasm, this would provide as well an explanation for the observed migration of 99mTc-labeled antisense DNA into the nucleus.

Key Words: antisense DNA • mdr1 messenger RNA • mechanism • in situ transcription • transcription rate


Related articles in JNM:

This Month in JNM

JNM 2006 47: 7a-8a. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
X. Liu, Y. Wang, K. Nakamura, S. Kawauchi, A. Akalin, D. Cheng, L. Chen, M. Rusckowski, and D. J. Hnatowich
Auger Radiation-Induced, Antisense-Mediated Cytotoxicity of Tumor Cells Using a 3-Component Streptavidin-Delivery Nanoparticle with 111In
J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2009; 50(4): 582 - 590.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
Z. F. Walls, M. Puttaraju, G. F. Temple, and S. S. Gambhir
A Generalizable Strategy for Imaging pre-mRNA Levels in Living Subjects Using Spliceosome-Mediated RNA Trans-Splicing
J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2008; 49(7): 1146 - 1154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
K. Nakamura, Y. Wang, X. Liu, A. Kubo, and D. J. Hnatowich
Cell Culture and Xenograft-Bearing Animal Studies of Radiolabeled Antisense DNA Carrier Nanoparticles with Streptavidin as a Linker
J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2007; 48(11): 1845 - 1852.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2006 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.