JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JNM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meyer, P. T.
Right arrow Articles by Bauer, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meyer, P. T.
Right arrow Articles by Bauer, A.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 47 No. 2 200-207
© 2006 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Clinical Investigation

18F-CPFPX PET: On the Generation of Parametric Images and the Effect of Scan Duration

Philipp T. Meyer, MD, David Elmenhorst, MD, Andreas Matusch, MD, Oliver Winz, MSc, Karl Zilles, MD and Andreas Bauer, MD

Institute of Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany

Correspondence: For correspondence contact: Andreas Bauer, MD, Research Center Juelich, 52425 Juelich, Germany. E-mail: an.bauer{at}fz-juelich.de

8-cyclopentyl-3-(3-18F-fluoropropyl)-1-propylxanthine (18F-CPFPX) is a novel PET ligand for in vivo quantification of cerebral A1 adenosine receptors. The present study investigated the applicability of voxelwise graphical analysis to the generation of parametric images of the total volume of distribution (DVt) of 18F-CPFPX as a prerequisite for voxel-by-voxel statistical analysis. The benefit of spatial smoothing for reduction of noise-dependent negative bias in graphical analysis was examined. Additionally, the effect of scan duration on the accuracy of analyses based on volumes of interest (VOIs) and individual voxels was explored. Methods: Ten healthy male volunteers underwent bolus-injection 18F-CPFPX PET (90 min). The data were analyzed using a 2-tissue-compartment model and graphical analysis. Voxelwise graphical analysis was performed with and without preceding spatial gaussian smoothing. Results: Voxelwise graphical analysis yielded high-quality parametric images. However, voxelwise graphical analysis suffered from a negative bias (mean bias in cortical regions, –9.6% to –7.5%), which could be attenuated considerably by spatial smoothing (using a kernel of 5 mm in full width at half maximum, bias of –4.0% to –1.9%). Shortening the total scan duration to 60 min had minor effects on the accuracy of VOI-based analysis (15 VOIs x 10 subjects); the resulting error only occasionally exceeded ±5% in individual regions (n = 6 for 2-tissue-compartment model, n = 10 for VOI-based graphical analysis, always within ±7.5%). Quantification accuracy was acceptable with scan durations of 60 and 75 min in voxelwise graphical analysis with spatial smoothing (mean bias in cortical regions, –8.4% to –5.9%) and without spatial smoothing (bias, –9.2% to –11.6%), respectively. Conclusion: High-quality DVt parametric images of 18F-CPFPX can be generated by voxelwise graphical analysis. The noise-dependent negative bias of voxelwise graphical analysis is greatly reduced by spatial smoothing. A shortened scan of 60 min will enhance the clinical applicability of 18F-CPFPX PET.

Key Words: PET • 18F-CPFPX • A1 adenosine receptor • parametric imaging


Related articles in JNM:

This Month in JNM

JNM 2006 47: 7a-8a. [Full Text]  






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2006 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.