JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JNM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hsueh, W.-A.
Right arrow Articles by Silverman, D. H.S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hsueh, W.-A.
Right arrow Articles by Silverman, D. H.S.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 47 No. 12 1995-1999
© 2006 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Basic Science Investigation

Predicting Chemotherapy Response to Paclitaxel with 18F-Fluoropaclitaxel and PET

Wei-Ann Hsueh1, Amanda L. Kesner1, Anne Gangloff1, Mark D. Pegram2, Malgorzata Beryt2, Johannes Czernin1, Michael E. Phelps1 and Daniel H.S. Silverman1

1 Ahmanson Biological Imaging Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California; and 2 Divison of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Daniel H.S. Silverman, MD, PhD, CHS AR-144, Nuclear Medicine Clinic, MC694215, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90095-6942. E-mail: dsilver{at}ucla.edu Guest Editor: Norbert Avril, St. Bartholomew's Hospital

Paclitaxel is used as a chemotherapy drug for the treatment of various malignancies, including breast, ovarian, and lung cancers. To evaluate the potential of a noninvasive prognostic tool for specifically predicting the resistance of tumors to paclitaxel therapy, we examined the tumoral uptake of 18F-fluoropaclitaxel (18F-FPAC) in mice bearing human breast cancer xenografts by using small-animal–dedicated PET and compared 18F-FPAC uptake with the tumor response to paclitaxel treatment. Methods: PET data were acquired after tail vein injection of approximately 9 MBq of 18F-FPAC in anesthetized nude mice bearing breast cancer xenografts. Tracer uptake in reconstructed images was quantified by region-of-interest analyses and compared with the tumor response, as measured by changes in tumor volume, after treatment with paclitaxel. Results: Mice with tumors that progressed demonstrated lower tumoral uptake of 18F-FPAC than mice with tumors that did not progress or that regressed (r = 0.55, P < 0.02; n = 19), indicating that low 18F-FPAC uptake was a significant predictor of chemoresistance. Conversely, high 18F-FPAC uptake predicted tumor regression. This relationship was found for mice bearing xenografts from cell lines selected to be either sensitive or intrinsically resistant to paclitaxel in vitro. Conclusion: PET data acquired with 18F-FPAC suggest that this tracer holds promise for the noninvasive quantification of its distribution in vivo in a straightforward manner. In combination with approaches for examining other aspects of resistance, such quantification could prove useful in helping to predict subsequent resistance to paclitaxel chemotherapy of breast cancer.

Key Words: breast cancer • paclitaxel • 18F • PET • chemotherapy

COPYRIGHT © 2006 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.


Related articles in JNM:

This Month in JNM

JNM 2006 47: 9a-10a. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
J. H. Lee, E. L. Rosen, and D. A. Mankoff
The Role of Radiotracer Imaging in the Diagnosis and Management of Patients with Breast Cancer: Part 2--Response to Therapy, Other Indications, and Future Directions
J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2009; 50(5): 738 - 748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2006 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.