HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JNM Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wang, Y. Articles by Pomper, M. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wang, Y. Articles by Pomper, M. G.

Performance Evaluation of the GE Healthcare eXplore VISTA Dual-Ring Small-Animal PET Scanner

¹ Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland; and ² Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Martin G. Pomper, MD, PhD, Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 600 N. Wolfe St./Phipps B-100, Baltimore, MD 21287-2182. E-mail: mpomper{at}jhmi.edu

We evaluated the performance characteristics of the eXplore VISTA dual-ring small-animal PET scanner, a stationary, ring-type, depth-of-interaction (DOI) correcting system designed to simultaneously maximize sensitivity, resolution, and resolution uniformity over a field of view sufficient to image rodent-sized animals. Methods: We measured the intrinsic spatial resolution response of the VISTA detector modules, spatial and volume resolution throughout a representative portion of the field of view, and imaged several common resolution phantoms to provide a qualitative picture of resolution performance. We obtained an axial sensitivity profile and measured central point source sensitivity, scatter fractions and noise equivalent count (NEC) rates for rat- and mouse-sized objects using different energy windows, and count rate linearity. In addition, we measured the energy and timing resolution of both of the crystal layers (cerium-doped gadolinium orthosilicate and cerium-doped lutetium–yttrium orthosilicate) that give VISTA machines a DOI compensation capability. We examined the effectiveness of this DOI compensation by comparing spatial resolution measurements with and without the DOI correction enabled. Finally, several animal studies were included to illustrate system performance in the field. Results: Spatial and volume resolutions averaged approximately 1.4 mm and 2.9 mm³, respectively (with 3-dimensional Fourier rebinning and 2-dimensional filtered backprojection image reconstructions and an energy window of 250–700 keV), along the central axis of the scanner, and the spatial resolution was better than 1.7 mm and 2.1 mm at 1 and 2 cm off the central axis, respectively. Central point source sensitivity measured approximately 4% with peak NEC rates of 126.8 kcps at 455 kBq/mL and 77.1 kcps at 141 kBq/mL for mouse- and rat-sized uniform, cylindric phantoms, respectively. The radial spatial resolution at 2.8 cm off axis with DOI compensation was 2.5 mm but degraded (by 56%) to 3.9 mm without DOI compensation (as would be the case with a geometrically identical scanner without DOI correction capability). Conclusion: These results indicate that the VISTA small-animal PET scanner is well suited to imaging rodent-sized animals. The combination of high spatial resolution, resolution uniformity, sensitivity, and count rate performance, made possible in part by the novel use of phoswich detector modules, confers significant technical advantages over machines with similar geometry but without DOI correction capability.

Key Words: small-animal PET • PET performance evaluation • VISTA small-animal PET scanner

Related articles in JNM:

This Month in JNM

JNM 2006 47: 9a-10a. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. M.W. Tsui and D. L. Kraitchman Recent Advances in Small-Animal Cardiovascular Imaging J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2009; 50(5): 667 - 670. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. P. Visser, J. A. Disselhorst, M. Brom, P. Laverman, M. Gotthardt, W. J.G. Oyen, and O. C. Boerman Spatial Resolution and Sensitivity of the Inveon Small-Animal PET Scanner J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2009; 50(1): 139 - 147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Terrovitis, K. F. Kwok, R. Lautamaki, J. M. Engles, A. S. Barth, E. Kizana, J. Miake, M. K. Leppo, J. Fox, J. Seidel, et al. Ectopic Expression of the Sodium-Iodide Symporter Enables Imaging of Transplanted Cardiac Stem Cells In Vivo by Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography or Positron Emission Tomography J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 11, 2008; 52(20): 1652 - 1660. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Yang, Y. Wu, J. Qi, S. St. James, H. Du, P. A. Dokhale, K. S. Shah, R. Farrell, and S. R. Cherry A Prototype PET Scanner with DOI-Encoding Detectors J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2008; 49(7): 1132 - 1140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. N. Tipre, J. J. Fox, D. P. Holt, G. Green, J. Yu, M. Pomper, R. F. Dannals, and F. M. Bengel In Vivo PET Imaging of Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathoneuronal Mechanisms in the Rat J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2008; 49(7): 1189 - 1195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. J. Pichler, H. F. Wehrl, and M. S. Judenhofer Latest Advances in Molecular Imaging Instrumentation J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2008; 49(Suppl_2): 5S - 23S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. S. Kim, J. S. Lee, K. C. Im, S. J. Kim, S.-Y. Kim, D. S. Lee, and D. H. Moon Performance Measurement of the microPET Focus 120 Scanner J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2007; 48(9): 1527 - 1535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]