JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JNM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frater, C.
Right arrow Articles by Fogelman, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Frater, C.
Right arrow Articles by Fogelman, I.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 47 No. 10 1577-1580
© 2006 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Clinical Investigation

Bone Scintigraphy Predicts Outcome of Steroid Injection for Plantar Fasciitis

Clayton Frater1, Dzung Vu2, Hans Van der Wall3, Chandima Perera4, Paul Halasz2, Louise Emmett3 and Ignac Fogelman5

1 University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; 2 School of Medical Sciences, University of NSW, Sydney, Australia; 3 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Concord Hospital, Sydney, Australia; 4 Department of Rheumatology, Concord Hospital, Sydney, Australia; and 5 Division of Imaging, King's College, London, United Kingdom

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Hans Van der Wall, PhD, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Concord Hospital, Hospital Rd., Concord 2139, Australia. E-mail: hansv{at}nmrf.org.au

Plantar fasciitis is a common cause of foot pain and may be disabling. Although localized injection is painful, anesthetics or corticosteroids can relieve symptoms well. Bone scintigraphy can confirm the diagnosis. We hypothesized that blood-pool abnormalities could provide prognostic information on the response to such injections. Methods: We devised scintigraphic criteria that graded the blood-pool abnormalities as being localized to the plantar enthesis, being localized to half the length of the aponeurosis, or involving the whole aponeurosis. We evaluated 24 patients with an established diagnosis of plantar fasciitis, 8 of whom had bilateral disease, leading to a total of 32 feet injected. Results: After injection, pain was relieved either completely or nearly completely in 20 feet. The other 12 feet had short-term or no improvement, with persistent pain and loss of function at 4–5 wk after injection. Of the 20 feet responding to injection, 14 had focal hyperemia on blood-pool images and 6 had minimal extension into the proximal third of the plantar soft tissues. No patient with diffuse hyperemia in the plantar fascia had a response (5/12 feet). On the delayed images of the 20 responders, mild inferior calcaneal uptake was seen in 8 feet, moderate uptake in 6, and severe uptake in 6. These groups did not significantly differ (P > 0.05). The blood-pool studies had good reproducibility, with a {kappa}-value of 0.64. Conclusion: Critical evaluation of plantar blood-pool images provides prognostic information on the response to localized injection into the enthesis. Reporting such studies is simple and reproducible.

Key Words: scintigraphy • plantar fasciitis • injection • corticosteroids


Related articles in JNM:

This Month in JNM

JNM 2006 47: 9a-10a. [Full Text]  






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2006 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.