JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JNM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Line, B. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ghandehari, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Line, B. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ghandehari, H.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 46 No. 9 1552-1560
© 2005 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Basic Science Investigations

Targeting Tumor Angiogenesis: Comparison of Peptide and Polymer-Peptide Conjugates

Bruce R. Line, MD1,2,3, Amitava Mitra, MS3,4, Anjan Nan, PhD3,4 and Hamidreza Ghandehari, PhD2,3,4

1 Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
2 Greenebaum Cancer Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
3 Center for Nanomedicine and Cellular Delivery, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland
4 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland

Endothelial cells in tumor angiogenesis are highly accessible, genetically stable and present unique molecular markers for targeted therapy. Neoplasia is also characterized by enhanced vascular permeability and disordered lymphatics so that both active and passive targeting strategies may play a role in localizing angiogenesis-targeted agents. To investigate the relative importance of these targeting strategies, the tissue biodistribution of both endothelial-specific and nonspecific peptides and their macromolecular peptide-copolymer conjugates were studied in 2 xenograft models of prostate cancer. Tumor-to-normal tissue background ratios (T/B) of these constructs were compared to evaluate the effect of molecular size on blood clearance and nonspecific vascular permeability. Methods: Water-soluble N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide (HPMA) copolymers were synthesized with side chains terminated in a doubly cyclized Arg-Gly-Asp motif KACDCRGDCFCG (RGD4C: active peptide targeting the {alpha}Vß3 integrin) and KACDCRGECFCG (RGE4C: nonactive peptide). The bioactivity of the polymer conjugates and free peptides was characterized in vitro by endothelial cell adhesion assay. The 99mTc(CO)3-labeled compounds were injected into SCID mice bearing DU145 or PC-3 prostate tumor xenografts for scintigraphic imaging and necropsy organ counting. Results: HPMA copolymer-RGD4C conjugates showed similar inhibition of cell adhesion as free RGD4C attached to 99mTc(CO)3 chelator N-{omega}-bis(2-pyridylmethyl)-L-lysine (RGD4C-DPK) and were significantly higher (P < 0.05) than RGE4C, HPMA copolymer-RGE4C, and a hydrolyzed HPMA copolymer precursor. Scintigraphic images obtained at 24 h showed specific tumor localization of HPMA copolymer-RGD4C and RGD4C compared with RGE4C conjugates in both prostate tumor models. Twenty-four–hour necropsy data in the DU145 model showed significantly higher (P < 0.001) tumor localization for HPMA copolymer-RGD4C (4.60 ± 1.80 %ID/g [percentage injected dose per gram tissue]) and RGD4C-DPK (3.37 ± 0.32 %ID/g) compared with HPMA copolymer-RGE4C (1.24 ± 0.15 %ID/g) and RGE4C-DPK (0.32 ± 0.04 %ID/g). Similar results were observed in the PC-3 model. Moreover, higher T/B for the polymer conjugates indicated reduced extravasation of the targeted polymeric conjugates in normal tissues. Conclusion: Specific molecular targeting of the {alpha}vß3 integrin and nonspecific vascular permeability are both significant in the relative tumor localization of polymeric conjugates of RGD4C. Extravascular leak in nonspecific organs appears to be a major factor in reducing the T/B for the peptide molecules.

Key Words: angiogenesis • HPMA copolymers • RGD peptides • targeted delivery • biodistribution


Related articles in JNM:

Molecular Targeting with Peptides or Peptide-Polymer Conjugates: Just a Question of Size?
Hans-Jürgen Wester and Horst Kessler
JNM 2005 46: 1940-1945. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
W. Cai, J. Rao, S. S. Gambhir, and X. Chen
How molecular imaging is speeding up antiangiogenic drug development.
Mol. Cancer Ther., November 1, 2006; 5(11): 2624 - 2633.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
T. Bach-Gansmo, R. Danielsson, A. Saracco, B. Wilczek, T. V. Bogsrud, A. Fangberget, A. Tangerud, and D. Tobin
Integrin Receptor Imaging of Breast Cancer: A Proof-of-Concept Study to Evaluate 99mTc-NC100692
J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2006; 47(9): 1434 - 1439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
H.-J. Wester and H. Kessler
Molecular Targeting with Peptides or Peptide-Polymer Conjugates: Just a Question of Size?
J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2005; 46(12): 1940 - 1945.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.