JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JNM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shekhar, R.
Right arrow Articles by Bybel, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shekhar, R.
Right arrow Articles by Bybel, B.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 46 No. 9 1488-1496
© 2005 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Basic Science Investigations

Automated 3-Dimensional Elastic Registration of Whole-Body PET and CT from Separate or Combined Scanners

Raj Shekhar, PhD1, Vivek Walimbe, BE2,3, Shanker Raja, MD4, Vladimir Zagrodsky, PhD2, Mangesh Kanvinde, MD, PhD5, Guiyun Wu, MD6 and Bohdan Bybel, MD6

1 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland
2 Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
3 Biomedical Engineering Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
4 Department of Radiology, Lahey Clinic, Burlington, Massachusetts
5 Department of Radiology, Medina General Hospital, Medina, Ohio
6 Department of Molecular and Functional Imaging, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio

Registration and fusion of whole-body functional PET and anatomic CT is significant for accurate differentiation of viable tumors from benign masses, radiotherapy planning and monitoring treatment response, and cancer staging. Whole-body PET and CT acquired on separate scanners are misregistered because of differences in patient positions and orientations, couch shapes, and breathing protocols. Although a combined PET/CT scanner removes many of these misalignments, breathing-related nonrigid mismatches still persist. Methods: We have developed a new, fully automated normalized mutual information–based 3-dimensional elastic image registration technique that can accurately align whole-body PET and CT images acquired on stand-alone scanners as well as a combined PET/CT scanner. The algorithm morphs the PET image to align spatially with the CT image by generating an elastic transformation field by interpolating quaternions and translations from multiple 6-parameter rigid-body registrations, each obtained for hierarchically subdivided image subvolumes. Fifteen whole-body (spanning thorax and abdomen) PET/CT image pairs acquired separately and 5 image pairs acquired on a combined scanner were registered. The cases were selected on the basis of the availability of both CT and PET images, without any other screening criteria, such as a specific clinical condition or prognosis. A rigorous quantitative validation was performed by evaluating algorithm performance in the context of variability among 3 clinical experts in the identification of up to 32 homologous anatomic landmarks. Results: The average execution time was 75 and 45 min for images acquired using separate scanners and combined scanner, respectively. Visual inspection indicated improved matching of homologous structures in all cases. The mean registration accuracy (5.5 and 5.9 mm for images from separate scanners and combined scanner, respectively) was found comparable to the mean interexpert difference in landmark identification (5.6 ± 2.4 and 6.6 ± 3.4 mm, respectively). The variability in landmark identification did not show statistically significant changes on replacing any expert by the algorithm. Conclusion: We have presented a new and automated elastic registration algorithm to correct for nonrigid misalignments in whole-body PET/CT images as well as improve the "mechanical" registration of a combined PET/CT scanner. The algorithm performance was on par with the average opinion of 3 experts.

Key Words: image registration • elastic registration • whole-body PET/CT • multimodality • image fusion


Related articles in JNM:

THIS MONTH IN JNM

JNM 2005 46: 8a-9a. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
A. Grgic, U. Nestle, A. Schaefer-Schuler, S. Kremp, E. Ballek, J. Fleckenstein, C. Rube, C.-M. Kirsch, and D. Hellwig
Nonrigid Versus Rigid Registration of Thoracic 18F-FDG PET and CT in Patients with Lung Cancer: An Intraindividual Comparison of Different Breathing Maneuvers
J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2009; 50(12): 1921 - 1926.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol ImgHome page
T. Dickfeld, P. Lei, V. Dilsizian, J. Jeudy, J. Dong, A. Voudouris, R. Peters, M. Saba, R. Shekhar, and S. Shorofsky
Integration of three-dimensional scar maps for ventricular tachycardia ablation with positron emission tomography-computed tomography.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., January 1, 2008; 1(1): 73 - 82.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. Z. Wong, E. K. Paulson, R. C. Nelson, E. F. Patz Jr., and R. E. Coleman
Practical Approach to Diagnostic CT Combined with PET
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2007; 188(3): 622 - 629.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
A. Martinez-Moller, M. Souvatzoglou, N. Navab, M. Schwaiger, and S. G. Nekolla
Artifacts from Misaligned CT in Cardiac Perfusion PET/CT Studies: Frequency, Effects, and Potential Solutions
J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2007; 48(2): 188 - 193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.