HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JNM Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tran, A. Articles by Silverman, D. H.S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tran, A. Articles by Silverman, D. H.S.

¹⁸F-FDG PET for Staging Breast Cancer in Patients with Inner-Quadrant Versus Outer-Quadrant Tumors: Comparison with Long-Term Clinical Outcome

Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California

Extraaxillary metastases (i.e., in the absence of axillary involvement) are more likely to develop in patients with inner-quadrant (IQ) breast cancer than in patients with outer-quadrant (OQ) primary tumors. The relative difficulty of identifying extraaxillary metastases may lead to understaging of cancer in these patients. This study examined whether ¹⁸F-FDG PET findings were differentially associated with the location of primary tumors, and with long-term prognosis, in IQ and OQ patients. Methods: Follow-up data were obtained for 141 patients whose breast cancer was staged by PET and who were documented to have IQ (n = 42) or OQ (n = 99) primaries. Results were stratified according to PET findings consistent with different metastatic patterns. Data were further analyzed with respect to disease outcome after a mean 3-y follow-up period. Results: Among IQ patients, progressive disease was identified in 26.1%, compared with 13.1% of OQ patients, for a relative risk (RR) of 2.0. Of patients with PET findings of isolated extraaxillary metastases, 36.1% had progressive disease, compared with 10.7% of other patients (RR = 3.4), and 61.9% of IQ patients had isolated extraaxillary metastases identified on PET, compared with 10.1% of OQ patients (RR = 6.1). Conclusion: IQ patients demonstrated a 6-fold greater frequency of PET findings of isolated extraaxillary metastasis, and such findings were associated with triple the risk for disease progression. Patients with IQ tumors could be vulnerable to understaging with conventional staging approaches and may particularly benefit from PET during the staging process.

Key Words: breast cancer • PET • FDG

Related articles in JNM:

THIS MONTH IN JNM

JNM 2005 46: 8a-9a. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Chia, S. M. Swain, D. R. Byrd, and D. A. Mankoff Locally Advanced and Inflammatory Breast Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2008; 26(5): 786 - 790. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. L. Rosen, W. B. Eubank, and D. A. Mankoff FDG PET, PET/CT, and Breast Cancer Imaging RadioGraphics, October 1, 2007; 27(suppl_1): S215 - S229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]