|
|
|||||||||
Clinical Investigations |
1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
2 Department of Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
3 Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
Detection of cholangiocarcinoma in extrahepatic bile duct strictures is a continuing challenge in clinical practice because brush cytology taken at endoscopic retrograde cholangiography has an average sensitivity of 50%. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of dual-modality PET/CT using 18F-FDG for noninvasive differentiation of extrahepatic bile duct strictures. Methods: Twenty-two PET/CT studies were performed on 20 patients (10 women, 10 men; mean age ± SD, 63 ± 14 y) with extrahepatic bile duct strictures on endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. PET imaging was started 101 ± 22 min after injection of 369 ± 48 MBq of 18F-FDG. Blood glucose was 100 ± 20 mg/dL. PET images were reconstructed iteratively with attenuation correction based on a rescaling of the CT image. CT was performed within 1 min before the PET study, with the patient in the same position. CT was used to place a volume of interest 5 cm in diameter at the liver hilus for quantitative evaluation of PET images by means of standardized uptake values (SUVs). Results: Final diagnosis was histologically proven cholangiocarcinoma in 14 cases and benign causes of strictures in 8 cases without evidence of malignancy during a follow-up of 18 ± 3 mo. All patients with cholangiocarcinoma presented with focal increased uptake in the liver hilus with an SUV of 6.8 ± 3.3 (range, 3.915.8), compared with 2.9 ± 0.3 (range, 2.53.3) in patients with benign causes of strictures (P = 0.003). There was a clear cutoff SUV of 3.6 for detection of malignancy in the liver hilus. Conclusion: 18F-FDG PET/CT provided high accuracy for noninvasive detection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma in extrahepatic bile duct strictures.
Key Words: FDG PET CT cholangiocarcinoma
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. I. Sainani, O. A. Catalano, N.-S. Holalkere, A. X. Zhu, P. F. Hahn, and D. V. Sahani Cholangiocarcinoma: Current and Novel Imaging Techniques1 RadioGraphics, September 1, 2008; 28(5): 1263 - 1287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bramkamp, K. J. Dedes, K. Strobel, J. Pahnke, S. Breitenstein, and P.-A. Clavien Cholestasis From Malignant Melanoma J. Clin. Oncol., February 20, 2007; 25(6): 725 - 726. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Nishiyama, Y. Yamamoto, K. Fukunaga, N. Kimura, A. Miki, Y. Sasakawa, H. Wakabayashi, K. Satoh, and M. Ohkawa Dual-Time-Point 18F-FDG PET for the Evaluation of Gallbladder Carcinoma J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2006; 47(4): 633 - 638. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | RSS | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |