JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pinborg, L. H.
Right arrow Articles by Knudsen, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pinborg, L. H.
Right arrow Articles by Knudsen, G. M.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 46 No. 7 1119-1127
© 2005 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Clinical Investigations

Quantification of 123I-PE2I Binding to Dopamine Transporter with SPECT After Bolus and Bolus/Infusion

Lars H. Pinborg, MD1, Morten Ziebell, MD1, Vibe G. Frøkjær, MD1, Robin de Nijs, MS1, Claus Svarer, MS, PhD1, Steven Haugbøl, MD1, Stig Yndgaard, MD2 and Gitte M. Knudsen, MD, PhD1

1 Neurobiology Research Unit, University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
2 Department of Anesthesia, University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark

The aim of the present study was to describe a method combining easy implementation in a clinical setting with accuracy and precision in quantification of 123I-labeled N-(3-iodoprop-(2E)-enyl)-2ß-carboxymethoxy-3ß-(4'-methylphenyl)nortropane (PE2I) binding to brain dopamine transporter. Methods: Five healthy subjects (mean age, 50 y; range, 40–68 y) were studied twice. In the first experiment, dynamic SPECT data and arterial plasma input curves obtained after 123I-PE2I bolus injection were assessed using Logan, kinetic, transient equilibrium, and peak equilibrium analyses. Accurate and precise determination of BP1 (binding potential times the free fraction in the metabolite-corrected plasma compartment) and BP2 (binding potential times the free fraction in the intracerebral nonspecifically bound compartment) was achieved using Logan analysis and kinetic analysis, with a total study time of 90 min. In the second experiment, 123I-PE2I was administrated as a combined bolus and constant infusion. The bolus was equivalent to 2.7 h of constant infusion. Results: The bolus-to-infusion ratio of 2.7 h was based on the average terminal clearance rate from plasma in the bolus experiments. Steady state was attained in brain and plasma within 2 h, and time-activity curves remained constant for another 2 h. Even when an average bolus-to-infusion ratio was used, the striatal BP1 and BP2 values calculated with kinetic analysis (BP1 = 21.1 ± 1.1; BP2 = 4.1 ± 0.4) did not significantly differ from those calculated with bolus/infusion analysis (BP1 = 21.0 ± 1.2; BP2 = 4.3 ± 0.3). Computer simulations confirmed that a 2-fold difference in terminal clearance rate from plasma translates into only a 10% difference in BP1 and BP2 calculated from 120 to 180 min after tracer administration. Conclusion: The bolus/infusion approach allows accurate and precise quantification of 123I-PE2I binding to dopamine transporter and is easily implemented in a clinical setting.

Key Words: 123I-PE2I • dopamine transporter • SPECT • kinetic analysis • Logan analysis • bolus/infusion analysis







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.