JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JNM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vallabhajosula, S.
Right arrow Articles by Bander, N. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vallabhajosula, S.
Right arrow Articles by Bander, N. H.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 46 No. 5 850-858
© 2005 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Basic Science Investigations

Prediction of Myelotoxicity Based on Bone Marrow Radiation-Absorbed Dose: Radioimmunotherapy Studies Using 90Y- and 177Lu-Labeled J591 Antibodies Specific for Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen

Shankar Vallabhajosula, PhD1, Stanley J. Goldsmith, MD1, Klaus A. Hamacher, PhD1, Lale Kostakoglu, MD1, Shota Konishi, MD1, Mathew I. Milowski, MD2,3, David M. Nanus, MD2,3 and Neil H. Bander, MD3

1 Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital–Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York
2 Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, New York Presbyterian Hospital–Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York
3 Laboratory of Urological Oncology, Department of Urology, New York Presbyterian Hospital–Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York

In radioimmunotherapy, myelotoxicity due to bone marrow radiation-absorbed dose is the predominant factor and frequently is the dose-limiting factor that determines the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). With 90Y- and 131I-labeled monoclonal antibodies, it has been reported that myelotoxicity cannot be predicted on the basis of the amount of radioactive dose administered or the bone marrow radiation-absorbed dose (BMrad), estimated using blood radioactivity concentration. As part of a phase I dose-escalation study in patients with prostate cancer with 90Y-DOTA-J591 (DOTA = 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N',N'',N'''-tetraacetic acid) (90Y-J591) and 177Lu-DOTA-J591 (177Lu-J591), we evaluated the potential value of several factors in predicting myelotoxicity. Methods: Seven groups of patients (n = 28) received 370–2,775 MBq/m2 (10–75 mCi/m2) of 177Lu-J591 and 5 groups of patients (n = 27) received 185–740 MBq (5–20 mCi/m2) of 90Y-J591. Pharmacokinetics and imaging studies were performed for 1–2 wk after 177Lu treatment, whereas patients receiving 90Y had these studies performed with 111In-DOTA-J591 (111In-J591) as a surrogate. The BMrad was estimated based on blood radioactivity concentration. Myelotoxicity consisting of thrombocytopenia or neutropenia was graded 1–4 based on criteria of the National Cancer Institute. Results: Blood pharmacokinetics are similar for both tracers. The radiation dose (mGy/MBq) to the bone marrow was 3 times higher with 90Y (0.91 ± 0.43) compared with that with 177Lu (0.32 ± 0.10). The MTD was 647.5 MBq/m2 with 90Y-J591 and 2,590 MBq/m2 with 177Lu-J591. The percentage of patients with myelotoxicity (grade 3–4) increased with increasing doses of 90Y (r = 0.91) or 177Lu (r = 0.92). There was a better correlation between the radioactive dose administered and the BMrad with 177Lu (r = 0.91) compared with that with 90Y (r = 0.75). In addition, with 177Lu, the fractional decrease in platelets (FDP) correlates well with both the radioactive dose administered (r = 0.88) and the BMrad (r = 0.86). In contrast, with 90Y, there was poor correlation between the FDP and the radioactive dose administered (r = 0.20) or the BMrad (r = 0.26). Similar results were also observed with white blood cell toxicity. Conclusion: In patients with prostate cancer, myelotoxicity after treatment with 177Lu-J591 can be predicted on the basis of the amount of radioactive dose administered or the BMrad. The lack of correlation between myelotoxicity and 90Y-J591 BMrad may be due to several factors. 90Y-J591 may be less stable in vivo and, as a result, higher amounts of free 90Y may be localized in the bone. In addition, the cross-fire effect of high-energy ß-particles within the bone and the marrow may deliver radiation dose nonuniformly within the marrow.

Key Words: radioimmunotherapy • myelotoxicity • 177Lu-labeled J591 monoclonal antibody


Related articles in JNM:

THIS MONTH IN JNM

JNM 2005 46: 8a-9a. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. Vallabhajosula, S. J. Goldsmith, L. Kostakoglu, M. I. Milowsky, D. M. Nanus, and N. H. Bander
Radioimmunotherapy of Prostate Cancer Using 90Y- and 177Lu-Labeled J591 Monoclonal Antibodies: Effect of Multiple Treatments on Myelotoxicity
Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2005; 11(19): 7195s - 7200s.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.