JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JNM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dewaraja, Y. K.
Right arrow Articles by Kaminiski, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dewaraja, Y. K.
Right arrow Articles by Kaminiski, M. S.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 46 No. 5 840-849
© 2005 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Basic Science Investigations

Accurate Dosimetry in 131I Radionuclide Therapy Using Patient-Specific, 3-Dimensional Methods for SPECT Reconstruction and Absorbed Dose Calculation

Yuni K. Dewaraja, PhD1, Scott J. Wilderman, PhD1, Michael Ljungberg, PhD2, Kenneth F. Koral, PhD1, Kenneth Zasadny, PhD3 and Mark S. Kaminiski, MD4

1 Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, The University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
2 Department of Medical Radiation Physics, University of Lund, Lund, Sweden
3 Pfizer Global Research and Development, Ann Arbor, Michigan
4 Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan

131I radionuclide therapy studies have not shown a strong relationship between tumor absorbed dose and response, possibly due to inaccuracies in activity quantification and dose estimation. The goal of this work was to establish the accuracy of 131I activity quantification and absorbed dose estimation when patient-specific, 3-dimensional (3D) methods are used for SPECT reconstruction and for absorbed dose calculation. Methods: Clinically realistic voxel-phantom simulations were used in the evaluation of activity quantification and dosimetry. SPECT reconstruction was performed using an ordered-subsets expectation maximization (OSEM) algorithm with compensation for scatter, attenuation, and 3D detector response. Based on the SPECT image and a patient-specific density map derived from CT, 3D dosimetry was performed using a newly implemented Monte Carlo code. Dosimetry was evaluated by comparing mean absorbed dose estimates calculated directly from the defined phantom activity map with those calculated from the SPECT image of the phantom. Finally, the 3D methods were applied to a radioimmunotherapy patient, and the mean tumor absorbed dose from the new calculation was compared with that from conventional dosimetry obtained from conjugate-view imaging. Results: Overall, the accuracy of the SPECT-based absorbed dose estimates in the phantom was >12% for targets down to 16 mL and up to 35% for the smallest 7-mL tumor. To improve accuracy in the smallest tumor, more OSEM iterations may be needed. The relative SD from multiple realizations was <3% for all targets except for the smallest tumor. For the patient, the mean tumor absorbed dose estimate from the new Monte Carlo calculation was 7% higher than that from conventional dosimetry. Conclusion: For target sizes down to 16 mL, highly accurate and precise dosimetry can be obtained with 3D methods for SPECT reconstruction and absorbed dose estimation. In the future, these methods can be applied to patients to potentially establish correlations between tumor regression and the absorbed dose statistics from 3D dosimetry.

Key Words: 3-dimensional dosimetry • radioimmunotherapy • SPECT • Monte Carlo dosimetry • 131I


Related articles in JNM:

THIS MONTH IN JNM

JNM 2005 46: 8a-9a. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
R. Accorsi, J. S. Karp, and S. Surti
Improved Dose Regimen in Pediatric PET
J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2010; 51(2): 293 - 300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
P. Bourgeois
A Proposition for the Use of Radioiodine in WDTC Management
J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2009; 50(2): 328 - 329.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
A. Divoli, S. Chiavassa, L. Ferrer, J. Barbet, G. D Flux, and M. Bardies
Effect of Patient Morphology on Dosimetric Calculations for Internal Irradiation as Assessed by Comparisons of Monte Carlo Versus Conventional Methodologies
J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2009; 50(2): 316 - 323.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
M. T. Madsen
Recent Advances in SPECT Imaging
J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2007; 48(4): 661 - 673.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
Y. Du, J. Honeychurch, M. Glennie, P. Johnson, and T. Illidge
Microscopic Intratumoral Dosimetry of Radiolabeled Antibodies Is a Critical Determinant of Successful Radioimmunotherapy in B-Cell Lymphoma
Cancer Res., February 1, 2007; 67(3): 1335 - 1343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
H. Song, B. He, A. Prideaux, Y. Du, E. Frey, W. Kasecamp, P. W. Ladenson, R. L. Wahl, and G. Sgouros
Lung Dosimetry for Radioiodine Treatment Planning in the Case of Diffuse Lung Metastases
J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2006; 47(12): 1985 - 1994.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.