JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JNM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Slomka, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Berman, D. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Slomka, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Berman, D. S.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 46 No. 5 728-735
© 2005 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Clinical Investigations

Automatic Detection and Size Quantification of Infarcts by Myocardial Perfusion SPECT: Clinical Validation by Delayed-Enhancement MRI

Piotr J. Slomka, PhD1,2, David Fieno, PhD, MD1, Louise Thomson, MD1, John D. Friedman, MD1,2, Sean W. Hayes, MD1, Guido Germano, PhD1,2 and Daniel S. Berman, MD1,2

1 Departments of Imaging and Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
2 Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California

We aimed to validate the accuracy of a new automated myocardial perfusion SPECT quantification based on normal limits for detection and sizing of infarcts, using delayed-enhancement MRI (DE-MRI) as a gold standard. Methods: Eighty-two immediate 201Tl rest scans and 26 201Tl delayed redistribution scans were compared with resting DE-MRI scans acquired within 24 h of SPECT acquisition. The immediate 201Tl scans were considered for validation of infarct detection and the delayed 201Tl scans were considered for infarct sizing. A simplified quantification scheme was used in which defect extent (EXT) and total perfusion deficit (TPD) parameters were derived automatically from SPECT images by comparison with sex-matched normal limits and applying a 3.0 average deviation criterion. The total extent of hyperenhancement expressed as the percentage of the left ventricle was derived from DE-MRI images by visual definition of myocardial contours and defects. DE-MRI and SPECT images were fused in 3 dimensions for visual comparison. Phantom data were also quantified using the same EXT and TPD measures for defects ranging from 5% to 70% of the myocardium. Results: The area under the receiver-operator-characteristic curve for the detection of infarct on immediate rest scans was 0.91 ± 0.03 for EXT and 0.90 ± 0.03 for TPD (P = not significant). The sensitivity and specificity for the detection of infarct by EXT on immediate 201Tl rest scan were 87% and 91%, respectively, with the optimal defect size threshold of 4%. Six of 7 cases with DE-MRI defects < 5% were detected by SPECT. Infarct sizes obtained from DE-MRI correlated well with EXT (slope = 0.94, offset = 3.8%; r = 0.84) and TPD (slope = 0.75, offset = 4.2%; r = 0.85) obtained from delayed SPECT 201Tl scans. Excellent correlation was observed between the SPECT quantification and the physical defect size for the phantom data. The actual size of the defect was better estimated by EXT (slope = 1.00, offset 1.33%; r = 0.99) than by TPD (slope = 0.79, offset = 1.9%; r = 0.99). Conclusion: Automated quantification of the EXT on myocardial perfusion SPECT images can reliably detect infarcts and measure infarct sizes.

Key Words: SPECT quantification • myocardial perfusion • multimodality • infarct • delayed-enhancement MRI


Related articles in JNM:

THIS MONTH IN JNM

JNM 2005 46: 8a-9a. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. J. Gibbons, P. A. Araoz, and E. E. Williamson
The Year in Cardiac Imaging
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 5, 2006; 48(11): 2324 - 2339.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.