JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sciagrà, R.
Right arrow Articles by Antoniucci, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sciagrà, R.
Right arrow Articles by Antoniucci, D.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 46 No. 5 722-727
© 2005 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Clinical Investigations

Gated SPECT Evaluation of Outcome After Abciximab-Supported Primary Infarct Artery Stenting for Acute Myocardial Infarction: The Scintigraphic Data of the Abciximab and Carbostent Evaluation (ACE) Randomized Trial

Roberto Sciagrà, MD1, Guido Parodi, MD2, Alberto Pupi, MD1, Angela Migliorini, MD2, Renato Valenti, MD2, Guia Moschi, MD2, Giovanni Maria Santoro, MD2, Gentian Memisha, MD2 and David Antoniucci, MD2

1 Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Clinical Physiopathology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
2 Division of Cardiology, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy

We used gated SPECT to evaluate the impact of abciximab on the efficacy of myocardial reperfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing infarct-related artery stenting. Methods: The Abciximab and Carbostent Evaluation (ACE) trial randomized 400 infarct patients to stenting alone or stenting plus abciximab. One-month 99mTc-sestamibi gated SPECT was planned in a subgroup of consecutive patients to evaluate infarct size, infarct severity, left ventricular volumes, and ejection fraction. Results: The final study population included 182 patients (99 randomized to abciximab and 83 to stenting alone). Gated SPECT revealed smaller infarcts in the abciximab group than in the stenting-alone group (14.3% ± 11.7% vs. 18.1% ± 13%, P < 0.02), and lower infarct severity (minimum-to-maximum count ratio = 0.47 ± 0.17 vs. 0.41 ± 0.15, P < 0.02), resulting in a smaller left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (57.8 ± 20.0 vs. 64.6 ± 20.8 mL/m2, P = 0.03) and left ventricular end-systolic volume index (31.7 ± 17.4 vs. 37.5 ± 18.6 mL/m2, P = 0.05) in the abciximab group. One-month left ventricular ejection fraction was significantly higher in patients randomized to abciximab (47.4% ± 11.3% vs. 43.9% ± 11.7%, P = 0.05). Conclusion: The use of abciximab therapy as an adjunct to infarct-related artery stenting leads to a reduction in infarct size and severity, resulting in smaller 1-mo left ventricular volumes and better left ventricular function. Gated SPECT appears to be an ideal tool for outcome assessment in infarct patients undergoing different treatment strategies.

Key Words: acute myocardial infarction • angioplasty • gated SPECT • stenting







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.