JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JNM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shah, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Jokisch, D. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shah, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Jokisch, D. W.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 46 No. 2 344-353
© 2005 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Basic Science Investigations

A Paired-Image Radiation Transport Model for Skeletal Dosimetry

Amish P. Shah, PhD1, Wesley E. Bolch, PhD1,2, Didier A. Rajon, PhD3, Phillip W. Patton, PhD4 and Derek W. Jokisch, PhD5

1 Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
2 Department of Nuclear and Radiological Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
3 Deparment of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
4 Department of Health Physics, University of Nevada–Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada
5 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Francis Marion University, Florence, South Carolina

Toxicity of the hematopoietically active bone marrow continues to be a primary limitation in radionuclide therapies of cancer. Improved techniques for patient-specific skeletal dosimetry are thus crucial to the development of dose–response relationships needed to optimize these therapies (i.e., avoid both marrow toxicity and tumor underdosing). Current clinical methods of skeletal dose assessment rely heavily on a single set of bone and marrow cavity chord-length distributions in which particle energy deposition is tracked within an infinite extent of trabecular spongiosa, with no allowance for particle escape to cortical bone. In the present study, we introduce a paired-image radiation transport (PIRT) model that can provide a more realistic 3-dimensional geometry for particle transport of the skeletal site at both microscopic and macroscopic levels of its histology. Methods: Ex vivo CT scans were acquired of the lumbar vertebra and right proximal femur excised from a 66-y male cadaver (body mass index, 22.7 kg m–2). For both skeletal sites, regions of trabecular spongiosa and cortical bone were identified and segmented. Physical sections of interior spongiosa were then taken and subjected to nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) microscopy. Voxels within the resulting NMR microimages were segmented and labeled into regions of bone trabeculae, endosteum, active marrow, and inactive marrow. The PIRT methodology was then implemented within the EGSnrc radiation transport code, whereby electrons of various initial energies are simultaneously tracked within both the ex vivo CT macroimage and the NMR microimage of the skeletal site. Results: At electron initial energies greater than 50–200 keV, a divergence in absorbed fractions to active marrow is noted between PIRT model simulations and those estimated under infinite spongiosa transport techniques. Calculations of radionuclide S values under both methodologies imply that current chord-based models used in clinical skeletal dosimetry can overestimate dose to active bone marrow in these 2 skeletal sites by ~4%–23% for low-energy ß-emitters (33P, 169Er, and 177Lu), by ~4%–25% for intermediate-energy ß-emitters (153Sm, 186Re, and 89Sr), and by ~11%–30% for high-energy ß-emitters (32P, 188Re, and 90Y). Conclusion: The PIRT methodology allows for detailed modeling of the 3D macrostructure of individual marrow-containing bones within the skeleton, thus permitting improved estimates of absorbed fractions and radionuclide S values for intermediate-to-high ß-emitters.

Key Words: skeletal dosimetry • marrow dose • nuclear magnetic resonance microscopy • radionuclide S value • absorbed fraction


Related articles in JNM:

THIS MONTH IN JNM

JNM 2005 46: 8a-9a. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
W. E. Bolch, A. P. Shah, C. J. Watchman, D. W. Jokisch, P. W. Patton, D. A. Rajon, M. Zankl, N. Petoussi-Henss, and K. F. Eckerman
Skeletal absorbed fractions for electrons in the adult male: considerations of a revised 50-{micro}m definition of the bone endosteum
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, November 1, 2007; 127(1-4): 169 - 173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
C. J. Watchman, V. A. Bourke, J. R. Lyon, A. E. Knowlton, S. L. Butler, D. D. Grier, J. R. Wingard, R. C. Braylan, and W. E. Bolch
Spatial Distribution of Blood Vessels and CD34+ Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells Within the Marrow Cavities of Human Cancellous Bone
J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2007; 48(4): 645 - 654.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
J. M. Brindle, A. A. Trindade, A. P. Shah, D. W. Jokisch, P. W. Patton, J. C. Pichardo, and W. E. Bolch
Linear Regression Model for Predicting Patient-Specific Total Skeletal Spongiosa Volume for Use in Molecular Radiotherapy Dosimetry
J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2006; 47(11): 1875 - 1883.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.