JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JNM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bäck, T.
Right arrow Articles by Jacobsson, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bäck, T.
Right arrow Articles by Jacobsson, L.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 46 No. 12 2061-2067
© 2005 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Basic Science Investigations

211At Radioimmunotherapy of Subcutaneous Human Ovarian Cancer Xenografts: Evaluation of Relative Biologic Effectiveness of an {alpha}-Emitter In Vivo

Tom Bäck, BSc1, Håkan Andersson, MD, PhD2, Chaitanya R. Divgi, MD3, Ragnar Hultborn, MD, PhD2, Holger Jensen, PhD4, Sture Lindegren, PhD1, Stig Palm, PhD1 and Lars Jacobsson, PhD1

1 Department of Radiation Physics, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden
2 Department of Oncology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden
3 Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
4 Positron Emission Tomography and Cyclotron Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark

The use of {alpha}-particle emitters in radioimmunotherapy (RIT) appears to be promising. We previously obtained convincing results in the treatment of microscopic intraperitoneal ovarian cancer in nude mice by using the {alpha}-emitter 211At. This study was performed to evaluate the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 211At compared with that of 60Co {gamma}-irradiation in an RIT model. Our endpoint was growth inhibition (GI) of subcutaneous xenografts. Methods: GI after irradiation was studied with subcutaneous xenografts of the human ovarian cancer cell line NIH:OVCAR-3 implanted in nude mice. The animals received an intravenous injection of 211At-labeled monoclonal antibody MX35 F(ab')2 at different levels of radioactivity (0.33, 0.65, and 0.90 MBq). Control mice received unlabeled MX35 F(ab')2 only. To calculate the mean absorbed dose to tumor, a separate biodistribution study established the uptake of 211At in tumors and organs at different times after injection. External irradiation of the tumors was performed with 60Co. Tumor growth was monitored, and the normalized tumor volume (NTV) was calculated for each tumor. GI was defined by dividing the NTV values by the fitted NTV curve obtained from the corresponding control mice. To compare the biologic effects of the 2 radiation qualities, the mean value for GI (from day 8 to day 23) was plotted for each tumor as a function of its corresponding absorbed dose. From exponential fits of these curves, the doses required for a GI of 0.37 (D37) were derived, and the RBE of 211At was calculated. Results: The biodistribution study showed the uptake of the immunoconjugate by the tumor (amount of injected radioactivity per gram) to be 14% after 7 h. At 40 h, the ratio of uptake in tumors to uptake in blood reached a maximum value of 6.2. The administered activities of 211At corresponded to doses absorbed by tumors of 1.35, 2.65, and 3.70 Gy. The value (mean ± SEM) for D37 was 1.59 ± 0.08 Gy. Tumor growth after 60Co external irradiation showed a value for D37 of 7.65 ± 1.0 Gy. The corresponding RBE of 211At irradiation was 4.8 ± 0.7. Conclusion: Using a tumor GI model in nude mice, we were able to derive an RBE of {alpha}-particle RIT with 211At. The RBE was found to be 4.8 ± 0.7.

Key Words: astatine • radioimmunotherapy • relative biological effectiveness • xenografts


Related articles in JNM:

THIS MONTH IN JNM

JNM 2005 46: 7a-8a. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
C. Lundh, U. Lindencrona, P. Postgard, T. Carlsson, M. Nilsson, and E. Forssell-Aronsson
Radiation-Induced Thyroid Stunning: Differential Effects of 123I, 131I, 99mTc, and 211At on Iodide Transport and NIS mRNA Expression in Cultured Thyroid Cells
J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2009; 50(7): 1161 - 1167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
W. E. Bolch, K. F. Eckerman, G. Sgouros, and S. R. Thomas
MIRD Pamphlet No. 21: A Generalized Schema for Radiopharmaceutical Dosimetry--Standardization of Nomenclature
J. Nucl. Med., March 1, 2009; 50(3): 477 - 484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
A. Khaibullina, B.-S. Jang, H. Sun, N. Le, S. Yu, V. Frenkel, J. A. Carrasquillo, I. Pastan, K. C.P. Li, and C. H. Paik
Pulsed High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Enhances Uptake of Radiolabeled Monoclonal Antibody to Human Epidermoid Tumor in Nude Mice
J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2008; 49(2): 295 - 302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
J. Elgqvist, H. Andersson, T. Back, I. Claesson, R. Hultborn, H. Jensen, B. R. Johansson, S. Lindegren, M. Olsson, S. Palm, et al.
{alpha}-Radioimmunotherapy of Intraperitoneally Growing OVCAR-3 Tumors of Variable Dimensions: Outcome Related to Measured Tumor Size and Mean Absorbed Dose
J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2006; 47(8): 1342 - 1350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.