|
|
||||||||
Clinical Investigations |
Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of dual-time-point imaging for identifying malignant lesions in the breast by 18F-FDG PET. Methods: Fifty-four breast cancer patients with 57 breast lesions underwent 2 sequential PET scans (dual-time-point imaging). The average percent change in standardized uptake values (SUVs) between time point 1 and time point 2 was calculated. All PET study results were correlated with follow-up surgical pathology results. Results: Of the 57 breast lesions, 39 were invasive carcinoma and 18 were postbiopsy inflammation. Among the invasive carcinoma lesions, 33 (85%) showed an increase and 6 (15%) showed either no change or a decrease in SUVs over time. The percent change in SUVs from time point 1 to time point 2 (mean ± SD) was +12.6% ± 11.4% (P = 0.003). Of the 18 inflammatory lesions, 3 (17%) showed an increase and 15 (83%) showed either no change or a decrease in SUVs. The percent change in SUVs from time point 1 to time point 2 (mean ± SD) was 10.2% ± 16.5% (P = 0.03). Of the 57 normal contralateral breasts, 2 (3.5%) showed an increase and 55 (96.5%) showed either no change or a decrease in SUVs. The percent change in SUVs from time point 1 to time point 2 (mean ± SD) was 15.8% ± 17% (P = 0.005). Conclusion: There is increasing uptake of 18F-FDG over time in breast malignancies, whereas the uptake of 18F-FDG in inflammatory lesions and normal breast tissues decreases over time. A percent change of +3.75 or more in SUVs over time is highly sensitive and specific in differentiating inflammatory lesions from malignant lesions.
Key Words: 18F-FDG PET breast cancer dual-time-point imaging inflammation malignancy standardized uptake value
Related articles in JNM:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Nishizawa, S. Kojima, S. Teramukai, M. Inubushi, H. Kodama, Y. Maeda, H. Okada, B. Zhou, Y. Nagai, and M. Fukushima Prospective Evaluation of Whole-Body Cancer Screening With Multiple Modalities Including [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in a Healthy Population: A Preliminary Report J. Clin. Oncol., April 10, 2009; 27(11): 1767 - 1773. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Imbriaco, M. G. Caprio, G. Limite, L. Pace, T. De Falco, E. Capuano, and M. Salvatore Dual-Time-Point 18F-FDG PET/CT Versus Dynamic Breast MRI of Suspicious Breast Lesions Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2008; 191(5): 1323 - 1330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Hicks Time and Again, Children Resemble Their Parents J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2008; 49(10): 1577 - 1578. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Uesaka, Y. Demura, T. Ishizaki, S. Ameshima, I. Miyamori, M. Sasaki, Y. Fujibayashi, and H. Okazawa Evaluation of Dual-Time-Point 18F-FDG PET for Staging in Patients with Lung Cancer J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2008; 49(10): 1606 - 1612. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T-A HEUSNER, L S FREUDENBERG, H KUEHL, E A M HAUTH, P VEIT-HAIBACH, M FORSTING, A BOCKISCH, and G ANTOCH Whole-body PET/CT-mammography for staging breast cancer: initial results Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2008; 81(969): 743 - 748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Heusner, S. Kuemmel, L. Umutlu, A. Koeninger, L. S. Freudenberg, E. A.M. Hauth, K. R. Kimmig, M. Forsting, A. Bockisch, and G. Antoch Breast Cancer Staging in a Single Session: Whole-Body PET/CT Mammography J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2008; 49(8): 1215 - 1222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P Veit-Haibach, G Antoch, T Beyer, H Stergar, R Schleucher, E A M Hauth, and A Bockisch FDG-PET/CT in restaging of patients with recurrent breast cancer: possible impact on staging and therapy Br. J. Radiol., July 1, 2007; 80(955): 508 - 515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Golman, R. i. Zandt, M. Lerche, R. Pehrson, and J. H. Ardenkjaer-Larsen Metabolic Imaging by Hyperpolarized 13C Magnetic Resonance Imaging for In vivo Tumor Diagnosis. Cancer Res., November 15, 2006; 66(22): 10855 - 10860. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Avril 18F-FDG PET After Radiofrequency Ablation: Is Timing Everything? J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2006; 47(8): 1235 - 1237. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |