JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JNM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marie, P.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Bertrand, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marie, P.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Bertrand, A.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 46 No. 11 1789-1795
© 2005 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Clinical Investigations

OSEM Reconstruction, Associated with Temporal Fourier and Depth-Dependant Resolution Recovery Filtering, Enhances Results from Sestamibi and 201Tl 16-Interval Gated SPECT

Pierre-Yves Marie, MD1,2, Wassila Djaballah, MD1,3, Philippe R. Franken, MD4, Chris Vanhove, PhD4, Marc A. Muller, MD1, Henri Boutley, Tc1, Sylvain Poussier, PhD1, Pierre Olivier, MD1, Gilles Karcher, MD1 and Alain Bertrand, MD1,3

1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Nancy, France
2 UHP-INSERM U684, Nancy, France
3 UHP-INSERM ERI13, Nancy, France
4 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Arizona-VUB, Brussels, Belgium

Gated SPECT recorded with 16 intervals determines left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction more accurately than does gated SPECT recorded with 8 intervals but produces higher image noise. This study aimed to assess the results from sestamibi and 201Tl 16-interval gated SPECT when both signal-to-noise ratio and spatial resolution were enhanced with an original method of reconstruction. Methods: Forty patients with coronary artery disease underwent 201Tl and sestamibi 16-interval gated SPECT and, to be used as a reference, cardiac MRI. Assessments of global and regional LV function provided by ordered-subsets expectation maximization (OSEM) with depth-dependant resolution recovery and temporal Fourier filtering were compared with those from conventional filtered backprojection (FBP) previously optimized by screening various filter frequencies and various temporal smoothing levels. Results: For both tracers, LV ejection fraction was determined best when the association of OSEM with depth-dependant resolution recovery was used alone, with temporal Fourier filtering, or with a slight 2-frame temporal smoothing: Mean absolute values of relative errors ranged from 3.2% to 3.6% (4.0%–7.9% for FBP), and coefficient correlation ranged from 0.91 to 0.93 (0.70–0.91 for FBP). Among these 3 reconstruction methods, the association of OSEM with depth-dependant resolution recovery with temporal Fourier filtering provided the highest signal-to-noise ratio, with mean increases of 54% for sestamibi and 80% for 201Tl when compared with FBP, and the best analysis of segmental contractility, with exact agreement rates with MRI being 73% for 201Tl and 79% for sestamibi. Conclusion: OSEM associated with temporal Fourier filtering and depth-dependant resolution recovery filtering enhances the LV function assessment provided by sestamibi and 201Tl 16-interval gated SPECT and dramatically reduces image noise, a property that enhances and facilitates image interpretation.

Key Words: gated SPECT • MRI • ejection fraction • sestamibi • 201Tl


Related articles in JNM:

THIS MONTH IN JNM

JNM 2005 46: 7a-8a. [Full Text]  






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.