JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JNM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pan, X.-B.
Right arrow Articles by Silverman, D. H.S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pan, X.-B.
Right arrow Articles by Silverman, D. H.S.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 46 No. 10 1737-1744
© 2005 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Basic Science Investigations

Improving Influx Constant and Ratio Estimation in FDOPA Brain PET Analysis for Parkinson’s Disease

Xiao-Bo Pan, PhD1, Thomas G. Wright, PhD1, F. Joel Leong, MD, PhD2, Robert A. McLaughlin, PhD1, Jérôme M. Declerck, PhD1 and Daniel H.S. Silverman, MD, PhD2

1 Siemens Molecular Imaging, Oxford, United Kingdom
2 Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California

PET studies using L-3,4-dihydroxy-6-18F-fluorophenylalanine have been applied to assess the diminished functionality of the striatum in patients with suspected Parkinson’s disease. Two techniques for analyzing such studies are ratio methods and graphically computed influx constants. We propose a method for improving the consistency with which scans obtained by either of these techniques are analyzed. The method is based on a fully 3-dimensional analysis of the images. Methods: Fifty-one dynamically acquired datasets were corrected for motion before analysis. Regions of interest (ROIs) for the analysis were determined by manual affine registration to a standard template, using a separate transformation for each ROI. Indicator values for each ROI were computed by averaging the values of voxels having the highest activity within a specified proportion of the voxels in the ROI, to increase the robustness to perturbations in the ROI position. Sensitivity was analyzed by examining the variation in results obtained when the ROIs were translated by up to 6 mm. Results: We observed significant percentage differences in the computed influx constant before and after motion correction (mean variation ± SD, –0.75% ± 9.5% averaged over all regions of all patients). Our method was robust to placement of the cerebellum ROI, whereas a 2- dimensional analysis based on hand-drawn ROIs was associated with a 2- to 3-fold greater percentage variation in uptake for translations of 2 mm or more in ROI position. When we compared the 2 quantification techniques, our influx constants and ratios correlated at r2 = 0.91, P < 0.0001. Conclusion: Motion correction is an important step for computing reliable results in dynamic studies. The robustness of the results can be increased further by using standard normalized volumetric ROIs and by using the average value of a specified proportion of the voxels with the highest activity in the ROI as an indicator for that ROI. Influx constant values computed using our analysis technique closely correlated to values computed with ratio methods using this general approach.

Key Words: FDOPA • Patlak graphical analysis • ratio method • Parkinson’s disease • PET


Related articles in JNM:

THIS MONTH IN JNM

JNM 2005 46: 8a-9a. [Full Text]  






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.