JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JNM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Strauss, L. G.
Right arrow Articles by Thiesen, H.-J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Strauss, L. G.
Right arrow Articles by Thiesen, H.-J.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 45 No. 9 1528-1535
© 2004 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Basic Science Investigations

18F-FDG Kinetics and Gene Expression in Giant Cell Tumors

Ludwig G. Strauss, MD1, Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss, MD1, Dirk Koczan, PhD2, Ludger Bernd, MD3, Uwe Haberkorn, MD1, Volker Ewerbeck, MD3 and Hans-Jürgen Thiesen, MD2

1 Clinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
2 Institute of Immunology, University Rostock, Rostock, Germany
3 Department I, University Orthopedic Clinic, Heidelberg, Germany

18F-FDG kinetics were evaluated by use of compartment and noncompartment models of giant cell tumors. The kinetic data were compared with the gene expression data for a subgroup of patients. Methods: Nineteen patients with giant cell tumors were examined with PET and 18F-FDG, and tracer kinetics were assessed quantitatively. A 2-compartment model, including the transport constants k1–k4 as well as the vascular fraction (VB) for 18F-FDG, was used for evaluation of the data. A noncompartment model was used to calculate the fractal dimension of the 18F-FDG time–activity curve to assess the heterogeneity of the tracer kinetics. Furthermore, tumor specimens obtained from 5 patients were assessed with gene chip technology (U95A), and these data were compared with the quantitative 18F-FDG data. Results: The giant cell tumors showed generally enhanced 18F-FDG uptake 1 h after tracer application, with a mean 18F-FDG standardized uptake value (SUV) of 4.8 (range, 1.8–9.4). Quantitative evaluation of tracer kinetics showed a preferential increase for 18F-FDG transport, with a mean k1 of 0.340. The vascular fraction accounted for 35% of the tumor volume and was high compared with those for other tumors, such as soft-tissue sarcomas. 18F-FDG kinetics were heterogeneous, with a fractal dimension of 1.3. Gene chip analysis showed that the expression of 137 genes (1.1%) exceeded the median expression value of the reference gene, ß2-microglobulin. The highest expression was observed for the gene for the small, leucine-rich proteoglycan I (biglycan), which is important for bone cell differentiation and proliferative activity. Correlation analysis revealed an association of 18F-FDG data with the expression of several genes. Mainly genes related to angiogenesis were associated with the compartment parameters. The SUV at 56–60 min was correlated with the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor A (angiogenesis) and cell division cycle 2 protein (proliferation). Conclusion: Despite their classification as benign tumors, giant cell tumors have generally enhanced 18F-FDG uptake, mainly attributable to an enhanced vascular fraction and increased 18F-FDG transport. A comparison of gene chip data and 18F-FDG kinetic data showed a close association of quantitative 18F-FDG results and the expression of genes related to angiogenesis.

Key Words: giant cell tumor • 18F-FDG • quantification • gene expression


Related articles in JNM:

THIS MONTH IN JNM

JNM 2004 45: 8A-9A. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nucl. Med. Technol.Home page
E. Laffon, O. Barret, R. Marthan, and D. Ducassou
Is the Physical Decay Correction of the 18F-FDG Input Function in Dynamic PET Imaging Justified?
J. Nucl. Med. Technol., June 1, 2009; 37(2): 111 - 113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nucl. Med. Technol.Home page
E. Laffon, A.-L. Cazeau, A. Monet, H. de Clermont, P. Fernandez, R. Marthan, and D. Ducassou
The Effect of Renal Failure on 18F-FDG Uptake: A Theoretic Assessment
J. Nucl. Med. Technol., December 1, 2008; 36(4): 200 - 202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
L. G. Strauss, D. Koczan, S. Klippel, L. Pan, C. Cheng, S. Willis, U. Haberkorn, and A. Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss
Impact of Angiogenesis-Related Gene Expression on the Tracer Kinetics of 18F-FDG in Colorectal Tumors
J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2008; 49(8): 1238 - 1244.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
A. J. Beer, S. Lorenzen, S. Metz, K. Herrmann, P. Watzlowik, H.-J. Wester, C. Peschel, F. Lordick, and M. Schwaiger
Comparison of Integrin {alpha}v 3 Expression and Glucose Metabolism in Primary and Metastatic Lesions in Cancer Patients: A PET Study Using 18F-Galacto-RGD and 18F-FDG
J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2008; 49(1): 22 - 29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
A. Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss, P. Hohenberger, U. Haberkorn, H. R. Macke, M. Eisenhut, and L. G. Strauss
68Ga-Labeled Bombesin Studies in Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Comparison with 18F-FDG
J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2007; 48(8): 1245 - 1250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
T. Maeda, U. Tateishi, T. Terauchi, C. Hamashima, N. Moriyama, Y. Arai, E. E. Kim, and K. Sugimura
Unsuspected Bone and Soft Tissue Lesions Identified at Cancer Screening using Positron Emission Tomography
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2007; 37(3): 207 - 215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
A.M. McKinney, P. Reichert, J. Short, T. Dhurairaj, K. SantaCruz, Z. McKinney, and S. Kieffer
Metachronous, Multicentric Giant Cell Tumor of the Sphenoid Bone with Histologic, CT, MR Imaging, and Positron-Emission Tomography/CT Correlation
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2006; 27(10): 2199 - 2201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2004 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.