| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | RSS | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
||||||||||
Basic Science Investigations |
PET Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Semiquantitative standard uptake values (SUVs) are used for tumor diagnosis and response monitoring. However, the accuracy of the SUV and the accuracy of relative change during treatment are not well documented. Therefore, an experimental and simulation study was performed to determine the effects of noise, image resolution, and region-of-interest (ROI) definition on the accuracy of SUVs. Methods: Experiments and simulations are based on thorax phantoms with tumors of 10-, 15-, 20-, and 30-mm diameter and background ratios (TBRs) of 2, 4, and 8. For the simulation study, sinograms were generated by forward projection of the phantoms. For each phantom, 50 sinograms were generated at 3 noise levels. All sinograms were reconstructed using ordered-subset expectation maximization (OSEM) with 2 iterations and 16 subsets, with or without a 6-mm gaussian filter. For each tumor, the maximum pixel value and the average of a 50%, a 70%, and an adaptive isocontour threshold ROI were derived as well as with an ROI of 15 x 15 mm. The accuracy of SUVs was assessed using the average of 50 ROI values. Treatment response was simulated by varying the tumor size or the TBR. Results: For all situations, a strong correlation was found between maximum and isocontour-based ROI values resulting in similar dependencies on image resolution and noise of all studied SUV measures. A strong variation with tumor size of 
50% was found for all SUV values. For nonsmoothed data with high noise levels this variation was primarily due to noise, whereas for smoothed data with low noise levels partial-volume effects were most important. In general, SUVs showed under- and overestimations of 50% and depended on all parameters studied. However, SUV ratios, used for response monitoring, were only slightly dependent of ROI definition but were still affected by noise and resolution. Conclusion: The poor accuracy of the SUV under various conditions may hamper its use for diagnosis, especially in multicenter trials. SUV ratios used to measure response to treatment, however, are less dependent on noise, image resolution, and ROI definition. Therefore, the SUV might be more suitable for response-monitoring purposes.
Key Words: standard uptake value • response monitoring • region of interest • image resolution • noise
Related articles in JNM:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  P. Tylski, S. Stute, N. Grotus, K. Doyeux, S. Hapdey, I. Gardin, B. Vanderlinden, and I. Buvat Comparative Assessment of Methods for Estimating Tumor Volume and Standardized Uptake Value in 18F-FDG PET J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2010; 51(2): 268 - 276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Xie, J.-B. Yue, Z. Fu, R. Feng, and J.-M. Yu Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT before and after radiotherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma Ann. Onc., November 13, 2009; (2009) mdp430v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. L. Wahl, H. Jacene, Y. Kasamon, and M. A. Lodge From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2009; 50(Suppl_1): 122S - 150S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Boellaard Standards for PET Image Acquisition and Quantitative Data Analysis J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2009; 50(Suppl_1): 11S - 20S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Itti, C. Lin, J. Dupuis, G. Paone, D. Capacchione, A. Rahmouni, C. Haioun, and M. Meignan Prognostic Value of Interim 18F-FDG PET in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: SUV-Based Assessment at 4 Cycles of Chemotherapy J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2009; 50(4): 527 - 533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. W. L. Boland, M. A. Blake, N. S. Holalkere, and P. F. Hahn PET/CT for the Characterization of Adrenal Masses in Patients with Cancer: Qualitative Versus Quantitative Accuracy in 150 Consecutive Patients Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2009; 192(4): 956 - 962. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Nakajo, S. Jinnouchi, Y. Tashiro, H. Shirahama, E. Sato, C. Koriyama, and M. Nakajo Effect of Clinicopathologic Factors on Visibility of Colorectal Polyps with FDG PET Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2009; 192(3): 754 - 760. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. M. Park, J. M. Goo, H. J. Lee, M. A Kim, C. H. Lee, and M.-J. Kang Tumors in the Tracheobronchial Tree: CT and FDG PET Features1 RadioGraphics, January 1, 2009; 29(1): 55 - 71. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. R. Benz, V. Evilevitch, M. S. Allen-Auerbach, F. C. Eilber, M. E. Phelps, J. Czernin, and W. A. Weber Treatment Monitoring by 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Sarcomas: Interobserver Variability of Quantitative Parameters in Treatment-Induced Changes in Histopathologically Responding and Nonresponding Tumors J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2008; 49(7): 1038 - 1046. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Lin, E. Itti, C. Haioun, Y. Petegnief, A. Luciani, J. Dupuis, G. Paone, J.-N. Talbot, A. Rahmouni, and M. Meignan Early 18F-FDG PET for Prediction of Prognosis in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: SUV-Based Assessment Versus Visual Analysis J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2007; 48(10): 1626 - 1632. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. B. Dolovich and D. P. Schuster Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography versus Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography: Tools for Imaging the Lung Proceedings of the ATS, August 1, 2007; 4(4): 328 - 333. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Soret, S. L. Bacharach, and I. Buvat Partial-Volume Effect in PET Tumor Imaging J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2007; 48(6): 932 - 945. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B.-K. Teo, Y. Seo, S. L. Bacharach, J. A. Carrasquillo, S. K. Libutti, H. Shukla, B. H. Hasegawa, R. A. Hawkins, and B. L. Franc Partial-Volume Correction in PET: Validation of an Iterative Postreconstruction Method with Phantom and Patient Data J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2007; 48(5): 802 - 810. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. K. Shankar, J. M. Hoffman, S. Bacharach, M. M. Graham, J. Karp, A. A. Lammertsma, S. Larson, D. A. Mankoff, B. A. Siegel, A. Van den Abbeele, et al. Consensus Recommendations for the Use of 18F-FDG PET as an Indicator of Therapeutic Response in Patients in National Cancer Institute Trials J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2006; 47(6): 1059 - 1066. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Hashimoto, T. Tsujikawa, C. Kondo, M. Maki, M. Momose, A. Nagai, T. Ohnuki, T. Nishikawa, and K. Kusakabe Accuracy of PET for Diagnosis of Solid Pulmonary Lesions with 18F-FDG Uptake Below the Standardized Uptake Value of 2.5 J. Nucl. Med., March 1, 2006; 47(3): 426 - 431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Bunyaviroch and R. E. Coleman PET Evaluation of Lung Cancer J. Nucl. Med., March 1, 2006; 47(3): 451 - 469. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Kersemans, B. Cornelissen, K. Bacher, K. Kersemans, H. Thierens, R. A. Dierckx, B. De Spiegeleer, G. Slegers, and J. Mertens In Vivo Evaluation and Dosimetry of 123I-2-Iodo-D-Phenylalanine, a New Potential Tumor-Specific Tracer for SPECT, in an R1M Rhabdomyosarcoma Athymic Mouse Model J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2005; 46(12): 2104 - 2111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. J. Hoekstra, S. G. Stroobants, E. F. Smit, J. Vansteenkiste, H. van Tinteren, P. E. Postmus, R. P. Golding, B. Biesma, F. J.H.M. Schramel, N. van Zandwijk, et al. Prognostic Relevance of Response Evaluation Using [18F]-2-Fluoro-2-Deoxy-D-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography in Patients With Locally Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., November 20, 2005; 23(33): 8362 - 8370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W A Weber PET for response assessment in oncology: radiotherapy and chemotherapy Br. J. Radiol., November 1, 2005; Supplement_28(1): 42 - 49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. J. Herder, H. van Tinteren, R. P. Golding, P. J. Kostense, E. F. Comans, E. F. Smit, and O. S. Hoekstra Clinical Prediction Model To Characterize Pulmonary Nodules: Validation and Added Value of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Chest, October 1, 2005; 128(4): 2490 - 2496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Pasic, H. A. Brokx, E. F. Comans, G. J. Herder, E. K. Risse, O. S. Hoekstra, P. E. Postmus, and T. G. Sutedja Detection and Staging of Preinvasive Lesions and Occult Lung Cancer in the Central Airways with 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography: A Pilot Study Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2005; 11(17): 6186 - 6189. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. A. Weber Use of PET for Monitoring Cancer Therapy and for Predicting Outcome J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2005; 46(6): 983 - 995. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. A. Thie Understanding the Standardized Uptake Value, Its Methods, and Implications for Usage J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2004; 45(9): 1431 - 1434. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | RSS | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |
