HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) CME Activity Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JNM Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Torabi, M. Articles by Harisinghani, M. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Torabi, M. Articles by Harisinghani, M. G.

Current Concepts in Lymph Node Imaging^*

Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

The accurate identification and characterization of lymph nodes by imaging has important therapeutic and prognostic significance in patients with newly diagnosed cancers. The presence of nodal metastases limits the therapeutic options and also generally indicates worse prognosis in patients. Thus, it becomes crucial to have this information before commencing therapy. Current cross-sectional imaging modalities rely on insensitive size and morphologic criteria and, thus, lack the desired accuracy for characterizing lymph nodes. This is mainly because metastases can be present in non-enlarged lymph nodes and not all enlarged nodes are malignant. PET has overcome some of these limitations but is still constrained by current resolution limits for small nodal metastases. This has fueled the development of targeted techniques for nodal imaging and characterization as outlined in this article. In the past few years, studies have shown that these newer imaging techniques can bridge some of the limitations of existing imaging for nodal characterization and thereby provide the much-needed staging information before the initiation of therapy.

Key Words: cancer staging • lymph node imaging • lymph node metastasis • malignant lymphadenopathy • nodal morphology • MRI • CT • PET • ultrasound

Related articles in JNM:

THIS MONTH IN JNM

JNM 2004 45: 8A-9A. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. J. McMahon, N. M. Rofsky, and I. Pedrosa Lymphatic Metastases from Pelvic Tumors: Anatomic Classification, Characterization, and Staging Radiology, January 1, 2010; 254(1): 31 - 46. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Kim, W. J. Hyung, J. S. Lim, M.-S. Park, J. Y. Choi, Y. E. Chung, M.-J. Kim, and K. W. Kim Laparoscopic Ultrasonography-Assisted Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Sampling in Patients Evaluated for Stomach Cancer Recurrence J. Ultrasound Med., August 1, 2008; 27(8): 1229 - 1233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N Bharwani, N J Stephens, and S D Heenan Imaging of bladder cancer Imaging, June 1, 2008; 20(2): 97 - 111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Volker, T. Denecke, I. Steffen, D. Misch, S. Schonberger, M. Plotkin, J. Ruf, C. Furth, B. Stover, H. Hautzel, et al. Positron Emission Tomography for Staging of Pediatric Sarcoma Patients: Results of a Prospective Multicenter Trial J. Clin. Oncol., December 1, 2007; 25(34): 5435 - 5441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Tatsumi, J. H. Miller, and R. L. Wahl 18F-FDG PET/CT in Evaluating Non-CNS Pediatric Malignancies J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2007; 48(12): 1923 - 1931. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F E Moron and J Szklaruk Learning the nodal stations in the abdomen Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2007; 80(958): 841 - 848. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. H. Choi, W. K. Moon, J. H. Hong, K. R. Son, N. Cho, B. J. Kwon, J. J. Lee, J.-K. Chung, H. S. Min, and S. H. Park Lymph Node Metastasis: Ultrasmall Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide-enhanced MR Imaging versus PET/CT in a Rabbit Model Radiology, December 1, 2006; 242(1): 137 - 143. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]