| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Clinical Investigations |
1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
2 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
Although ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) lung scintigraphy is a well-accepted and frequently performed procedure in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism, there is growing controversy about its relevance, particularly due to the increasing competition between scintigraphy and CT. Even though comparative studies between both modalities have already been performed, their results were highly inconsistent. Remarkably, in most of those studies, conventional planar perfusion scans were compared with tomographic images acquired using state-of-the-art CT scanners—a study design that cannot give impartial results. Hence, the aim of our study was a balanced comparison between V/Q lung scintigraphy and CT angiography using advanced imaging techniques for both modalities. Methods: A total of 83 patients with suspected pulmonary embolism were examined using V/Q lung scintigraphy in SPECT technique as well as 4-slice spiral CT. Ventilation scans were done using an ultrafine aerosol. Additionally, planar images in 8 views were extracted from the V/Q SPECT datasets. Two experienced referees assessed each of the 3 modalities. The final diagnosis was made at a consensus meeting while taking into account all of the imaging modalities, laboratory tests, clinical data, and evaluation of a follow-up period. Results: In the course of the consensus conference, pulmonary embolism was diagnosed in 37 of the 83 patients (44.6%). Compared with planar scintigraphy, SPECT raised the number of detectable defects at the segmental level by 12.8% (+11 defects; P = 0.401) and at the subsegmental level by 82.6% (+57 defects; P < 0.01). The sensitivity/specificity/accuracy of planar V/Q scintigraphy and V/Q SPECT was 0.76/0.85/0.81 and 0.97/0.91/0.94, respectively, compared with 0.86/0.98/0.93 for multislice CT. Conclusion: SPECT and ultrafine aerosols are technical advancements that can substantially improve lung scintigraphy. Using advanced imaging techniques, V/Q scintigraphy and multislice spiral CT both yield an excellent and, in all aspects, comparable diagnostic accuracy, with CT leading in specificity while SPECT shows a superior sensitivity. Even though planar lung scintigraphy yields satisfactory results for a nontomographic modality, it does not compare with tomographic imaging.
Key Words: pulmonary embolism • lung scan • SPECT • multislice CT • tomographic imaging
Related articles in JNM:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. F. Thieme, T. R. C. Johnson, C. Lee, J. McWilliams, C. R. Becker, M. F. Reiser, and K. Nikolaou Dual-Energy CT for the Assessment of Contrast Material Distribution in the Pulmonary Parenchyma Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2009; 193(1): 144 - 149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Reinartz To PIOPED, or Not to PIOPED J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2008; 49(11): 1739 - 1740. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Authors/Task Force Members, A. Torbicki, A. Perrier, S. Konstantinides, G. Agnelli, N. Galie, P. Pruszczyk, F. Bengel, A. J.B. Brady, D. Ferreira, et al. Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Eur. Heart J., September 2, 2008; 29(18): 2276 - 2315. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. J. Roach, P. Thomas, M. Bajc, and B. Jonson Merits of V/Q SPECT Scintigraphy Compared with CTPA in Imaging of Pulmonary Embolism J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2008; 49(1): 167 - 168. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Suga, Y. Kawakami, H. Iwanaga, O. Tokuda, and N. Matsunaga Automated Breath-Hold Perfusion SPECT/CT Fusion Images of the Lungs Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2007; 189(2): 455 - 463. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. Harris, D. Bailey, S. Miles, E. Bailey, K. Rogers, P. Roach, P. Thomas, M. Hensley, and G. G. King Objective Analysis of Tomographic Ventilation-Perfusion Scintigraphy in Pulmonary Embolism Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 1, 2007; 175(11): 1173 - 1180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Luciani, S. Cavuto, L. Antiga, M. Miniati, S. Monti, M. Pistolesi, and G. Bertolini Bayes pulmonary embolism assisted diagnosis: a new expert system for clinical use Emerg. Med. J., March 1, 2007; 24(3): 157 - 164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Kluge, W. Luboldt, and G. Bachmann Acute pulmonary embolism to the subsegmental level: diagnostic accuracy of three MRI techniques compared with 16-MDCT. Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2006; 187(1): W7 - 14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Reinartz, H.-J. Kaiser, J. E. Wildberger, C. Gordji, B. Nowak, and U. Buell SPECT Imaging in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism: Automated Detection of Match and Mismatch Defects by Means of Image-Processing Techniques J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2006; 47(6): 968 - 973. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Ashraf and O. Ashraf Helical CT in Acute Pulmonary Embolism Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2006; 186(4): 1200 - 1200. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Patel and E. A. Kazerooni Reply Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2006; 186(4): 1200 - 1201. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. W. De Geeter, P. Reinartz, and U. Buell Tomographic Imaging in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism: Still, We Do Not Know J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2005; 46(12): 2119 - 2121. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |
