JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JNM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tio, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Zijlstra, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tio, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Zijlstra, F.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 45 No. 9 1437-1443
© 2004 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Clinical Investigations

PET for Evaluation of Differential Myocardial Perfusion Dynamics After VEGF Gene Therapy and Laser Therapy in End-Stage Coronary Artery Disease

René A. Tio, MD, PhD1, Eng S. Tan, MD1, Gillian A.J. Jessurun, MD, PhD1, Nic Veeger2, Pieter L. Jager, MD, PhD3, Riemer H.J.A. Slart, MD3, Richard M. de Jong, MD, PhD1, Jan Pruim, MD, PhD4, Geke A.P. Hospers, MD, PhD5, Antoon T.M. Willemsen, PhD4, Mike J.L. de Jongste, MD, PhD1, Ad J. van Boven, MD, PhD1, Dirk J. van Veldhuisen, MD, PhD1 and Felix Zijlstra, MD, PhD1

1 Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
2 Trial Coordination Center, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
3 Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
4 PET Center, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
5 Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

The purpose of this study was to appraise the value of PET in the assessment of the effect of supposedly proangiogenic new therapies such as gene therapy with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) gene and endomyocardial laser therapy. Methods: Thirty-five patients with end-stage coronary artery disease and class III (Canadian Cardiovascular Society) angina were included. Myocardial ischemia was evaluated with dipyridamole PET scanning and exercise tolerance with bicycle ergometry. Ten patients were treated with naked plasmid DNA encoding for human VEGF165 (VEGF) and 12 patients were treated with laser therapy (direct myocardial revascularization [DMR]) using an electromechanical mapping system. Thirteen patients were treated with standard medical therapy (control). Results: In both active treatment groups, angina was reduced in most subjects, except in 2 VEGF and 5 DMR patients. In the control group, no improvement in anginal classification was found, except in 3 subjects. On the PET scan, solely in the VEGF group, the stress perfusion was significantly improved (from 57 ± 33 to 81 ± 55 mL/min/100 g; P = 0.031). Furthermore, in the VEGF group, the number of ischemic segments was reduced from 274 ± 41 to 234 ± 48 segments (P = 0.004) but not in the DMR group (from 209 ± 43 to 215 ± 52 segments) or in the control group (from 218 ± 18 to 213 ± 28 segments). Bicycle exercise duration showed slight nonsignificant changes in the VEGF group (from 3.6 ± 2.0 to 4.6 ± 2.1 min), in the DMR group (from 5.1 ± 1.5 to 4.7 ± 1.3 min), and in the control group (from 3.3 ± 1.8 to 3.5 ± 2.3 min). Conclusion: PET showed that intramyocardial gene therapy with the human VEGF165 gene in contrast to laser DMR treatment effectively reduces myocardial ischemia.

Key Words: angiogenesis • coronary artery disease • endothelium • gene therapy • PET • refractory angina pectoris


Related articles in JNM:

THIS MONTH IN JNM

JNM 2004 45: 8A-9A. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
J. de Vries, M. J.L. DeJongste, and R. A. Tio
An open label, single-centre, randomized trial of spinal cord stimulation vs. percutaneous myocardial laser revascularization in patients with refractory angina pectoris: the SPiRiT trial
Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2006; 27(13): 1631 - 1632.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
D. McNab and S. N. Khan
An open label, single-centre, randomized trial of spinal cord stimulation vs. percutaneous myocardial laser revascularization in patients with refractory angina pectoris: the SPiRiT trial: reply
Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2006; 27(13): 1632 - 1632.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. J. Gibbons and P. A. Araoz
The Year in Cardiac Imaging
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 2, 2005; 46(3): 542 - 551.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2004 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.