JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JNM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jani, A. B.
Right arrow Articles by Weichselbaum, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jani, A. B.
Right arrow Articles by Weichselbaum, R. R.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 45 No. 8 1315-1322
© 2004 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Clinical Investigations

Radioimmunoscintigraphy for Postprostatectomy Radiotherapy: Analysis of Toxicity and Biochemical Control

Ashesh B. Jani, MD, MSEE1, Michael J. Blend, PhD, DO2, Russell Hamilton, PhD3, Charles Brendler, MD4, Charles Pelizzari, PhD1, Lani Krauz, RN1, Bipin Sapra, MTech1, Srinivasan Vijayakumar, MD5, Azhar Awan, MD1 and Ralph R. Weichselbaum, MD1

1 Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
2 Section of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois
3 Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
4 Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
5 Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Davis, California

Our goal was to evaluate the role of radioimmunoscintigraphy (RIS) directed against prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) in influencing postprostatectomy radiotherapy (RT) toxicity and biochemical control. Methods: The records of 107 postprostatectomy RT patients were reviewed. The group for whom no RIS scan was obtained (group A, n = 54) was identified as was the group for whom a RIS scan was obtained (group B, n = 53). Group B was further subdivided into those who had a RIS and CT-scan correlation to aid in treatment planning (subgroup B1, n = 40) versus those who did not (subgroup B2, n = 13). Gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities were reviewed for each of these groups and subgroups and compared. Biochemical failures (defined as 2 successive PSA rises after a nadir of ≥0.2 ng/mL) were identified to generate biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS) curves for each of the groups and subgroups. Results: No significant differences in late toxicity were observed between any group or subgroup. However, acute GI toxicity was higher in group B versus group A (P = 0.026), and acute GU toxicity was higher in subgroup B2 versus subgroup B1 (P = 0.050). Overall, most toxicity was grade 1 or 2; only one case of grade 3 toxicity and no cases of grade 4 or 5 toxicity were observed. Three-year BFFS was higher for group B versus group A (80.7% vs. 75.5%) and for subgroup B1 versus subgroup B2 (84.5% vs. 71.6%). On multivariate analysis of pretreatment (age, race), surgical/staging (stage, grade, margin status, extracapsular extension, lymph node status, seminal vesicle invasion, post-radical retropubic prostatectomy [RRP] prostate-specific antigen [PSA] nadir, maximum post-RRP PSA, and RRP-to-RT interval), and treatment (hormone therapy, RT dose, RT technique, RIS scan, and RIS/CT correlation) factors on BFFS, the only covariate reaching significance was RIS/CT correlation (P = 0.042). Conclusion: A small BFFS advantage was observed in patients for whom RIS was used to guide RT decision making and treatment planning; however, this advantage only reached significance in this study for those for whom the RIS/CT correlation was used to guide target definition. The improved PSA control using RIS was achieved with a small increase in acute toxicity but with no observed change in late toxicity. These findings can serve as the basis for prospective studies in this area of investigation.

Key Words: prostate cancer • prostatectomy • radiotherapy • radioimmunoscintigraphy


Related articles in JNM:

THIS MONTH IN JNM

JNM 2004 45: 8A-9A. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin Med ResHome page
A. B. Jani, S. L. Liauw, and M. J. Blend
The Role of Indium-111 Radioimmunoscintigraphy in Post-Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy Management of Prostate Cancer Patients
Clin. Med. Res., June 1, 2007; 5(2): 123 - 131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
M. K. Bucci, A. Bevan, and M. Roach III
Advances in Radiation Therapy: Conventional to 3D, to IMRT, to 4D, and Beyond
CA Cancer J Clin, March 1, 2005; 55(2): 117 - 134.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2004 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.