JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Nicholson, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wells, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Nicholson, R. L.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 45 No. 8 1309-1314
© 2004 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Clinical Investigations

Reducing Bladder Artifacts in Clinical Pelvic SPECT Images

R. Glenn Wells, PhD1,2,3, Troy Farncombe, PhD4, Edward Chang, MD5 and R. Larry Nicholson, MD1,2,3

1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, St. Joseph’s Health Care, London, Ontario, Canada
2 Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
3 Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada
4 Department of Nuclear Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
5 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hôtel Dieu-Grace Hospital, Windsor, Ontario, Canada

SPECT imaging of the pelvis is hampered by the presence of bladder artifacts, which render up to 20% of the images unreadable. The artifacts are caused by the high level of activity in the bladder and by the change in activity level as the bladder fills during data acquisition. The changing activity, together with the inhomogeneous attenuation of the pelvis, leads to inconsistencies in the projections and consequently artifacts when the data are reconstructed with filtered backprojection (FBP). dSPECT is an iterative algorithm that permits the reconstruction of dynamic SPECT images from a single, slow-rotation SPECT data acquisition. The reconstruction algorithm incorporates attenuation correction (AC) and changing tracer distributions and has been shown to reduce bladder artifacts in simulated data. In this study, we showed that dSPECT is effective at removing bladder artifacts from clinically acquired pelvic bone SPECT images. Methods: Data from 20 patient volunteers were reconstructed using FBP, rescaled block-iterative reconstruction (RBI) without AC, RBI with AC, and dSPECT. AC was based on patient-specific attenuation maps acquired with a 153Gd scanning line-source transmission system. For dSPECT, 16 time frames (4 projections/head/frame) were reconstructed and then summed to produce the final image. Artifact-to-bone contrast was compared, and image quality was subjectively assessed. Results: Compared with FBP, RBI without AC significantly reduced (P = 0.008) the streak artifact. Both dSPECT and RBI with AC further significantly reduced (P < 0.001) the streak artifact and also improved the uniformity and symmetry of bone tracer-uptake. RBI with AC and dSPECT produced equivalent images if the change in bladder activity during acquisition was modest; however, with large changes in the activity (>100%), RBI with AC did not completely remove the artifact. In that situation, dSPECT produced additional reductions in streak-to-bone contrast. Conclusion: Of the methods considered, dSPECT is the most effective at removing bladder artifacts in clinical pelvic SPECT.

Key Words: bladder artifact • bone SPECT • attenuation correction • dynamic SPECT




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
M. T. Madsen
Recent Advances in SPECT Imaging
J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2007; 48(4): 661 - 673.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2004 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.