|
|
||||||||
Clinical Investigations |
1 Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
2 General Electric Medical Systems, Waukesha, Wisconsin
3 Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
4 Nuclear Medicine Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
5 Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, California
We previously reported that respiratory motion is a major source of error in quantitation of lesion activity using combined PET/CT units. CT acquisition of the lesion occurs in seconds, rather than the 46 min required for PET emission scans. Therefore, an incongruent lesion position during CT acquisition will bias activity estimates using PET. In this study, we systematically analyzed the range of activity concentration changes, hence SUV, for lung lesions. Methods: Five lung cancer patients were scanned with PET/CT. In CT, data were acquired in correlation with the real-time positioning. CT images were acquired, in cine mode, at 0.45-s intervals for slightly longer (1 s) than a full respiratory cycle at each couch position. Other scanning parameters were a 0.5-s gantry rotation, 140 kVp, 175 mA, 10-mm couch increments, and a 2.5-mm slice thickness. PET data were acquired after intravenous injection of about 444555 MBq of 18F-FDG with a 1-h uptake period. The scanning time was 3 min per bed position for PET. Regularity in breathing was assisted by audio coaching. A commercial software program was then used to sort the acquired CT images into 10 phases, with 0% corresponding to end of inspiration (EI) and 50% corresponding to end of expiration (EE). Using the respiration-correlated CT data, images were rebinned to match the PET slice locations and thickness. Results: We analyzed 8 lesions from 5 patients. Reconstructed PET emission data showed up to a 24% variation in the lesion maximum standardized uptake values (SUVs) between EI and EE phases. Examination of all the phases showed an SUV variation of up to 30%. Also, in some cases the lesion showed up to a 9-mm shift in location and up to a 21% reduction in size when measured from PET during the EI phase, compared with during the EE phase. Conclusion: Using respiration-correlated CT for attenuation correction, we were able to quantitate the fluctuations in PET SUVs. Because those changes may lead to estimates of lower SUVs, the respiratory phase during CT transmission scanning needs to be measured or lung motion has to be regulated for imaging lung cancer in routine clinical practice.
Key Words: PET/CT motion SUV
Related articles in JNM:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Kawano, E. Ohtake, and T. Inoue Deep-Inspiration Breath-Hold PET/CT of Lung Cancer: Maximum Standardized Uptake Value Analysis of 108 Patients J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2008; 49(8): 1223 - 1231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. de Langen, V. E. M. van den Boogaart, J. T. Marcus, and M. Lubberink Use of H215O-PET and DCE-MRI to Measure Tumor Blood Flow Oncologist, June 1, 2008; 13(6): 631 - 644. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Soret, S. L. Bacharach, and I. Buvat Partial-Volume Effect in PET Tumor Imaging J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2007; 48(6): 932 - 945. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S.P. Meirelles, Y. E. Erdi, S. A. Nehmeh, O. D. Squire, S. M. Larson, J. L. Humm, and H. Schoder Deep-Inspiration Breath-Hold PET/CT: Clinical Findings with a New Technique for Detection and Characterization of Thoracic Lesions J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2007; 48(5): 712 - 719. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-Y. O. Wong, P. Mahajan, and D. Yan Dynamic Threshold for Radiation Target Volume by PET/CT J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2007; 48(5): 849 - 849. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Nehmeh, Y. E. Erdi, G. S.P. Meirelles, O. Squire, S. M. Larson, J. L. Humm, and H. Schoder Deep-Inspiration Breath-Hold PET/CT of the Thorax J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2007; 48(1): 22 - 26. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Biehl, F.-M. Kong, F. Dehdashti, J.-Y. Jin, S. Mutic, I. El Naqa, B. A. Siegel, and J. D. Bradley 18F-FDG PET Definition of Gross Tumor Volume for Radiotherapy of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Is a Single Standardized Uptake Value Threshold Approach Appropriate? J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2006; 47(11): 1808 - 1812. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P H Jarritt, K J Carson, A R Hounsell, and D Visvikis The role of PET/CT scanning in radiotherapy planning Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2006; 79(Special_Issue_1): S27 - S35. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A Yi, K. S. Lee, B.-T. Kim, J. Y. Choi, O. J. Kwon, H. Kim, Y. M. Shim, and M. J. Chung Tissue Characterization of Solitary Pulmonary Nodule: Comparative Study Between Helical Dynamic CT and Integrated PET/CT J. Nucl. Med., March 1, 2006; 47(3): 443 - 450. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P H Jarritt, A R Hounsell, K J Carson, D Visvikis, V P Cosgrove, J C Clarke, D P Stewart, V A L Fleming, R L Eakin, and A Zatari Use of combined PET/CT images for radiotherapy planning: initial experiences in lung cancer Br. J. Radiol., November 1, 2005; Supplement_28(1): 33 - 40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Pan, O. Mawlawi, S. A. Nehmeh, Y. E. Erdi, D. Luo, H. H. Liu, R. Castillo, R. Mohan, Z. Liao, and H.A. Macapinlac Attenuation Correction of PET Images with Respiration-Averaged CT Images in PET/CT J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2005; 46(9): 1481 - 1487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |