HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rajendran, J. G. Articles by Eary, J. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rajendran, J. G. Articles by Eary, J. F.

High-Dose ¹³¹I-Tositumomab (Anti-CD20) Radioimmunotherapy for Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma: Adjusting Radiation Absorbed Dose to Actual Organ Volumes

¹ Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
² Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington
³ Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) using ¹³¹I-tositumomab has been used successfully to treat relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). Our approach to treatment planning has been to determine limits on radiation absorbed dose to critical nonhematopoietic organs. This study demonstrates the feasibility of using CT to adjust for actual organ volumes in calculating organ-specific absorbed dose estimates. Methods: Records of 84 patients who underwent biodistribution studies after a trace-labeled infusion of ¹³¹I-tositumomab for RIT (January 1990 and April 2003) were reviewed. Serial planar -camera images and whole-body NaI probe counts were obtained to estimate ¹³¹I-antibody source-organ residence times as recommended by the MIRD Committee. The source-organ residence times for standard man or woman were adjusted by the ratio of the MIRD phantom organ mass to the CT-derived organ mass. Results: The mean radiation absorbed doses (in mGy/MBq) for our data using the MIRD model were lungs = 1.67; liver = 1.03; kidneys = 1.08; spleen = 2.67; and whole body = 0.3; and for CT volume-adjusted organ volumes (in mGy/MBq) were lungs = 1.30; liver = 0.92; kidneys = 0.76; spleen = 1.40; and whole body = 0.22. We determined the following correlation coefficients between the 2 methods for the various organs: lungs, 0.49 (P = 0.0001); liver, 0.64 (P = 0.004); kidneys, 0.45 (P = 0.0004); spleen, 0.22 (P = 0.0001); and whole body, 0.78 (P = 0.0001), for the residence times. For therapy, patients received mean ¹³¹I administered activities of 19.2 GBq (520 mCi) after adjustment for CT-derived organ mass compared with 16.0 GBq (433 mCi) that would otherwise have been given had therapy been based only using standard MIRD organ volumes—a statistically significant difference (P = 0.0001). Conclusion: We observed large variations in organ masses among our patients. Our treatments were planned to deliver the maximally tolerated radiation dose to the dose-limiting normal organ. This work provides a simplified method for calculating patient-specific radiation doses by adjusting for the actual organ mass and shows the value of this approach in treatment planning for RIT.

Key Words: non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma • radioimmunotherapy • internal dosimetry • MIRD models • patient-specific dosimetry

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. N. Winter, D. J. Inwards, S. Spies, G. Wiseman, D. Patton, W. Erwin, A. W. Rademaker, B. B. Weitner, S. F. Williams, M. S. Tallman, et al. Yttrium-90 Ibritumomab Tiuxetan Doses Calculated to Deliver up to 15 Gy to Critical Organs May Be Safely Combined With High-Dose BEAM and Autologous Transplantation in Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2009; 27(10): 1653 - 1659. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. K. Buck, S. Nekolla, S. Ziegler, A. Beer, B. J. Krause, K. Herrmann, K. Scheidhauer, H.-J. Wester, E. J. Rummeny, M. Schwaiger, et al. SPECT/CT J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2008; 49(8): 1305 - 1319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. G. Rajendran, A. K. Gopal, D. R. Fisher, L. D. Durack, T. A. Gooley, and O. W. Press Myeloablative 131I-Tositumomab Radioimmunotherapy in Treating Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Comparison of Dosimetry Based on Whole-Body Retention and Dose to Critical Organ Receiving the Highest Dose J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2008; 49(5): 837 - 844. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Cremonesi, M. Ferrari, C. M. Grana, A. Vanazzi, M. Stabin, M. Bartolomei, S. Papi, G. Prisco, G. Martinelli, G. Paganelli, et al. High-Dose Radioimmunotherapy with 90Y-Ibritumomab Tiuxetan: Comparative Dosimetric Study for Tailored Treatment J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2007; 48(11): 1871 - 1879. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Mah and K. M. Spicer Comparison of Medium- and High-Energy Collimators for 131I-Tositumomab Dosimetry J. Nucl. Med. Technol., September 1, 2007; 35(3): 148 - 153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. K. Gopal, J. G. Rajendran, T. A. Gooley, J. M. Pagel, D. R. Fisher, S. H. Petersdorf, D. G. Maloney, J. F. Eary, F. R. Appelbaum, and O. W. Press High-Dose [131I]Tositumomab (anti-CD20) Radioimmunotherapy and Autologous Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation for Adults >= 60 Years Old With Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Lymphoma J. Clin. Oncol., April 10, 2007; 25(11): 1396 - 1402. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. K. Tan, R. W. Wassenaar, and W. Zeng Collimator Selection, Acquisition Speed, and Visual Assessment of 131I-Tositumomab Biodistribution in a Phantom Model J. Nucl. Med. Technol., December 1, 2006; 34(4): 224 - 227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]