|
|
||||||||
Clinical Investigations |
1 Cambridge Breast Unit, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
2 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
3 Department of Physiological Medicine, St Georges Hospital Medical School, London, United Kingdom
The aim of the study was to use dual-isotope lymphoscintigraphy in healthy volunteers and women with breast cancerrelated lymphedema (BCRL) to detect and quantify transport of radiolabeled protein from a subcutaneous injection depot to local blood vessels as a potential mechanism of protection against edema resulting from treatment to the axilla. Methods: A total of 29 subjects and 18 women with a history of BCRL received bilateral subcutaneous injections of human IgG (HIgG) in the second dorsal web space of each hand, 99mTc-HIgG on one side and 111In-HIgG on the other. In 8 further healthy subjects, epinephrine was administered with the labeled HIgG. Radioactivity at each depot was measured at regular intervals for a total of 3 h using a collimated sodium iodide scintillation detector, and radioactivity in venous blood sampled from both arms was measured using an automatic sample counter. Ipsilateral blood timeconcentration curves were corrected for recirculating activity by subtraction of the simultaneous contralateral concentration, to define the component of ipsilateral blood resulting from local vascular access of radioprotein. Accumulation of activity in blood was expressed in relation to injected activity and activity that had left the depot and was calculated as a function of timein systemic blood, by multiplying contralateral concentrations by an estimate of the subjects blood volume, and in ipsilateral blood, by using indicator dilution theory and an assumed forearm blood flow of 20 mL/min. Results: 99mTc-HIgG and 111In-HIgG behave almost identically with respect to depot clearance and accumulation in contralateral venous blood, with or without epinephrine, which reduced both depot clearance and blood accumulation rate. Moreover, a side-to-side correlation with respect to contralateral accumulation was present in healthy subjects, was not abolished by epinephrine, and was maintained in the face of asymmetric accumulation in BCRL. Contralateral accumulation of radioprotein was reduced in BCRL after injection into the affected side only when the hand was involved. In contrast to contralateral sampling, ipsilateral timeconcentration and accumulation profiles were consistent with instability of 111In-HIgG and rapid local vascular access of small amounts of protein-free 111In. Experiments based on precipitation of protein with trichloroacetic acid confirmed relatively high levels of unbound ipsilateral 111In, especially in samples obtained early after injection. Substantial accumulation of protein-bound 99mTc was observed in ipsilateral blood, with a time course similar to that of contralateral accumulation. Positive correlation between ipsilateral and contralateral blood 99mTc activity was observed at all time points, often significantly, in contrast to 111In, for which it was negative at all time points. Ipsilateral accumulation of 99mTc adjusted for activity that had left the depot was unchanged with respect to the affected arm in BCRL patients. Conclusion: Whereas 111In-HIgG and 99mTc-HigG are interchangeable for measurement of depot clearance and contralateral venous accumulation rates, ipsilateral sampling is much more sensitive to protein-free radionuclide and detects significant differences resulting from some instability of 111In-HIgG. On the basis of 99mTc data, there appears to be substantial local vascular access of radioprotein within the arm, both in healthy subjects and in patients with BCRL, through either lymphaticovenous communications or direct transendothelial transport.
Key Words: lymphoscintigraphy breast cancerrelated lymphedema human IgG
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. N. Lane, L. B. Dolan, D. Worsley, and D. C. McKenzie Upper extremity lymphatic function at rest and during exercise in breast cancer survivors with and without lymphedema compared with healthy controls J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2007; 103(3): 917 - 925. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Modi, A. W. B. Stanton, W. E. Svensson, A. M. Peters, P. S. Mortimer, and J. R. Levick Human lymphatic pumping measured in healthy and lymphoedematous arms by lymphatic congestion lymphoscintigraphy J. Physiol., August 15, 2007; 583(1): 271 - 285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. O'Mahony, C. K. Solanki, R. W. Barber, P. S. Mortimer, A. D. Purushotham, and A. M. Peters Imaging of Lymphatic Vessels in Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: Intradermal Versus Subcutaneous Injection of 99mTc-Immunoglobulin. Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2006; 186(5): 1349 - 1355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Pain, R. W. Barber, C. K. Solanki, J. R. Ballinger, T. B. Britton, P. S. Mortimer, A. D. Purushotham, and A. M. Peters Short-term effects of axillary lymph node clearance surgery on lymphatic physiology of the arm in breast cancer J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2005; 99(6): 2345 - 2351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |