|
|
|||||||||
Clinical Investigations |
1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
2 Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
3 Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
4 Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
5 Biostatistics Shared Resource, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the influence and accuracy of 18F-FDG PET in target volume definition as a complementary modality to CT for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) using dedicated PET and CT scanners. Methods: Six HNC patients were custom fitted with head and neck and upper body immobilization devices, and conventional radiotherapy CT simulation was performed together with 18F-FDG PET imaging. Gross target volume (GTV) and pathologic nodal volumes were first defined in the conventional manner based on CT. A segmentation and surface-rendering registration technique was then used to coregister the 18F-FDG PET and CT planning image datasets. 18F-FDG PET GTVs were determined and displayed simultaneously with the CT contours. CT GTVs were then modified based on the PET data to form final PET/CT treatment volumes. Five-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) was then used to demonstrate dose targeting to the CT GTV or the PET/CT GTV. Results: One patient was PET-negative after induction chemotherapy. The CT GTV was modified in all remaining patients based on 18F-FDG PET data. The resulting PET/CT GTV was larger than the original CT volume by an average of 15%. In 5 cases, 18F-FDG PET identified active lymph nodes that corresponded to lymph nodes contoured on CT. The pathologically enlarged CT lymph nodes were modified to create final lymph node volumes in 3 of 5 cases. In 1 of 6 patients, 18F-FDGavid lymph nodes were not identified as pathologic on CT. In 2 of 6 patients, registration of the independently acquired PET and CT data using segmentation and surface rendering resulted in a suboptimal alignment and, therefore, had to be repeated. Radiotherapy planning using IMRT demonstrated the capability of this technique to target anatomic or anatomic/physiologic target volumes. In this manner, metabolically active sites can be intensified to greater daily doses. Conclusion: Inclusion of 18F-FDG PET data resulted in modified target volumes in radiotherapy planning for HNC. PET and CT data acquired on separate, dedicated scanners may be coregistered for therapy planning; however, dual-acquisition PET/CT systems may be considered to reduce the need for reregistrations. It is possible to use IMRT to target dose to metabolically active sites based on coregistered PET/CT data.
Key Words: head and neck cancer PET radiotherapy targets nuclear medicine treatment planning conformal radiotherapy
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. C. Ford, J. Herman, E. Yorke, and R. L. Wahl 18F-FDG PET/CT for Image-Guided and Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2009; 50(10): 1655 - 1665. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. Chung, H.-S. Jeong, S. G. Park, J. Y. Jang, Y.-I. Son, J. Y. Choi, S. H. Hyun, K. Park, M.-J. Ahn, Y. C. Ahn, et al. Metabolic Tumor Volume of [18F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Predicts Short-Term Outcome to Radiotherapy With or Without Chemotherapy in Pharyngeal Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2009; 15(18): 5861 - 5868. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Scott, D. H. Gunawardana, D. Bartholomeusz, J. E. Ramshaw, and P. Lin PET Changes Management and Improves Prognostic Stratification in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Prospective Study J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2008; 49(10): 1593 - 1600. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Benz, V. Evilevitch, M. S. Allen-Auerbach, F. C. Eilber, M. E. Phelps, J. Czernin, and W. A. Weber Treatment Monitoring by 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Sarcomas: Interobserver Variability of Quantitative Parameters in Treatment-Induced Changes in Histopathologically Responding and Nonresponding Tumors J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2008; 49(7): 1038 - 1046. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Blodgett, C. C. Meltzer, and D. W. Townsend PET/CT: Form and Function Radiology, February 1, 2007; 242(2): 360 - 385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P H Jarritt, K J Carson, A R Hounsell, and D Visvikis The role of PET/CT scanning in radiotherapy planning Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2006; 79(Special_Issue_1): S27 - S35. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K Newbold, M Partridge, G Cook, S A Sohaib, E Charles-Edwards, P Rhys-Evans, K Harrington, and C Nutting Advanced imaging applied to radiotherapy planning in head and neck cancer: a clinical review. Br. J. Radiol., July 1, 2006; 79(943): 554 - 561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P J Ell The contribution of PET/CT to improved patient management Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2006; 79(937): 32 - 36. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Nestle, S. Kremp, A. Schaefer-Schuler, C. Sebastian-Welsch, D. Hellwig, C. Rube, and C.-M. Kirsch Comparison of Different Methods for Delineation of 18F-FDG PET-Positive Tissue for Target Volume Definition in Radiotherapy of Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2005; 46(8): 1342 - 1348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T.-C. Yen, J. T.-C. Chang, S.-H. Ng, Y.-C. Chang, S.-C. Chan, H.-M. Wang, L.-C. See, T.-M. Chen, C.-J. Kang, Y.-F. Wu, et al. Staging of Untreated Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Buccal Mucosa with 18F-FDG PET: Comparison with Head and Neck CT/MRI and Histopathology J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2005; 46(5): 775 - 781. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Blodgett, B. Casagranda, D. W. Townsend, and C. C. Meltzer Issues, Controversies, and Clinical Utility of Combined PET/CT Imaging: What Is the Interpreting Physician Facing? Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2005; 184(5_supp): S138 - S145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | RSS | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |