| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Clinical Investigations |
1 Nuclear Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
2 Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
In routine PET, a 10- to 20-min transmission scan with a rotating 68Ge source is commonly obtained for attenuation correction (AC). AC is time-consuming using this procedure and could considerably be shortened by instead using a rapid CT scan. Our aim was to evaluate the feasibility of CT AC in quantitative myocardial perfusion PET using a hybrid PET/CT scanner. Methods: 13N-labeled NH3 and PET were used to measure myocardial blood flow (MBF) (mL/min/g) at rest and during standard adenosine stress. In group 1 (n = 7), CT scans (0.5 s) of the heart area with different tube currents (10, 40, 80, and 120 mA) were compared with a standard 68Ge transmission (20 min) and with no AC. In group 2 (n = 3), the repeatability of 8 consecutive CT scans at a tube current of 10 mA was assessed. In group 3 (n = 4), emission was preceded and followed by 3 CT scans (10 mA) and 1 68Ge scan for each patient. For reconstruction, filtered backprojection (FBP) was compared with iterative reconstruction (IT). Results: For group 1, no significant difference in mean MBF for resting and hyperemic scans was found when emission reconstructed with 68Ge AC was compared with emission reconstructed with CT AC at any of the different tube currents. Only emission without any correction differed significantly from 68Ge AC. For group 2, repeated measurements revealed a coefficient of variance ranging from 2% to 5% and from 2% to 6% at rest and at stress, respectively. For group 3, similar reproducibility coefficients (RC) for MBF were obtained when 68Ge ACFBP was compared with 68Ge ACIT (RC = 0.218) and when CT ACFBP was compared with CT ACIT (RC = 0.227). Even better reproducibility (lower RC) was found when 68Ge ACFBP was compared with CT ACFBP (RC = 0.130) and when 68Ge ACIT was compared with CT ACIT (RC = 0.146). Conclusion: Our study shows that for the assessment of qualitative and quantitative MBF with a hybrid PET/CT scanner, the use of CT AC (with a tube current of 10 mA) instead of 68Ge AC provides accurate results.
Key Words: hybrid PET/CT scanner • CT attenuation correction • myocardial blood flow
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. K. Buck, S. Nekolla, S. Ziegler, A. Beer, B. J. Krause, K. Herrmann, K. Scheidhauer, H.-J. Wester, E. J. Rummeny, M. Schwaiger, et al. SPECT/CT J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2008; 49(8): 1305 - 1319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 O. Gaemperli, T. Schepis, I. Valenta, P. Koepfli, L. Husmann, H. Scheffel, S. Leschka, F. R. Eberli, T. F. Luscher, H. Alkadhi, et al. Functionally Relevant Coronary Artery Disease: Comparison of 64-Section CT Angiography with Myocardial Perfusion SPECT Radiology, August 1, 2008; 248(2): 414 - 423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. L. Gould, T. Pan, C. Loghin, N. P. Johnson, and S. Sdringola Reducing Radiation Dose in Rest-Stress Cardiac PET/CT by Single Poststress Cine CT for Attenuation Correction: Quantitative Validation J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2008; 49(5): 738 - 745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Schepis, O. Gaemperli, V. Treyer, I. Valenta, C. Burger, P. Koepfli, M. Namdar, I. Adachi, H. Alkadhi, and P. A. Kaufmann Absolute Quantification of Myocardial Blood Flow with 13N-Ammonia and 3-Dimensional PET J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2007; 48(11): 1783 - 1789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. J. Einstein, K. W. Moser, R. C. Thompson, M. D. Cerqueira, and M. J. Henzlova Radiation Dose to Patients From Cardiac Diagnostic Imaging Circulation, September 11, 2007; 116(11): 1290 - 1305. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Schepis, O. Gaemperli, P. Koepfli, M. Namdar, I. Valenta, H. Scheffel, S. Leschka, L. Husmann, F. R. Eberli, T. F. Luscher, et al. Added Value of Coronary Artery Calcium Score as an Adjunct to Gated SPECT for the Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease in an Intermediate-Risk Population J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2007; 48(9): 1424 - 1430. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. L. Gould, T. Pan, C. Loghin, N. P. Johnson, A. Guha, and S. Sdringola Frequent Diagnostic Errors in Cardiac PET/CT Due to Misregistration of CT Attenuation and Emission PET Images: A Definitive Analysis of Causes, Consequences, and Corrections J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2007; 48(7): 1112 - 1121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. L. Bacharach PET/CT Attenuation Correction: Breathing Lessons J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2007; 48(5): 677 - 679. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. Gaemperli, T. Schepis, I. Valenta, L. Husmann, H. Scheffel, V. Duerst, F. R. Eberli, T. F. Luscher, H. Alkadhi, and P. A. Kaufmann Cardiac Image Fusion from Stand-Alone SPECT and CT: Clinical Experience J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2007; 48(5): 696 - 703. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. A.H. Cook, G. Carnes, T.-Y. Lee, and R. G. Wells Respiration-Averaged CT for Attenuation Correction in Canine Cardiac PET/CT J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2007; 48(5): 811 - 818. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Martinez-Moller, M. Souvatzoglou, N. Navab, M. Schwaiger, and S. G. Nekolla Artifacts from Misaligned CT in Cardiac Perfusion PET/CT Studies: Frequency, Effects, and Potential Solutions J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2007; 48(2): 188 - 193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. Wagner, M. Anton, S. G. Nekolla, S. Reder, J. Henke, S. Seidl, R. Hegenloh, M. Miyagawa, R. Haubner, M. Schwaiger, et al. Noninvasive Characterization of Myocardial Molecular Interventions by Integrated Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 21, 2006; 48(10): 2107 - 2115. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Schepis, O. Gaemperli, P. Koepfli, I. Valenta, K. Strobel, A. Brunner, S. Leschka, L. Desbiolles, L. Husmann, H. Alkadhi, et al. Comparison of 64-Slice CT with Gated SPECT for Evaluation of Left Ventricular Function J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2006; 47(8): 1288 - 1294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. M. Matter, M. T. Wyss, P. Meier, N. Spath, T. von Lukowicz, C. Lohmann, B. Weber, A. R. de Molina, J. C. Lacal, S. M. Ametamey, et al. 18F-Choline Images Murine Atherosclerotic Plaques Ex Vivo Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., March 1, 2006; 26(3): 584 - 589. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Namdar, P. Koepfli, R. Grathwohl, P. T. Siegrist, M. Klainguti, T. Schepis, R. Delaloye, C. A. Wyss, S. P. Fleischmann, O. Gaemperli, et al. Caffeine Decreases Exercise-Induced Myocardial Flow Reserve J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 17, 2006; 47(2): 405 - 410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Schwaiger, S. Ziegler, and S. G. Nekolla PET/CT: Challenge for Nuclear Cardiology J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2005; 46(10): 1664 - 1678. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. A. Kaufmann, M. Namdar, F. Matthew, M. Roffi, S. V. Aschkenasy, B. van der Loo, G. Sutsch, T. F. Luscher, and R. Jenni Novel Doppler Assessment of Intracoronary Volumetric Flow Reserve: Validation Against PET in Patients With or Without Flow-Dependent Vasodilation J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2005; 46(8): 1272 - 1277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Namdar, T. F. Hany, P. Koepfli, P. T. Siegrist, C. Burger, C. A. Wyss, T. F. Luscher, G. K. von Schulthess, and P. A. Kaufmann Integrated PET/CT for the Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease: A Feasibility Study J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2005; 46(6): 930 - 935. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. A. Kaufmann and P. G. Camici Myocardial Blood Flow Measurement by PET: Technical Aspects and Clinical Applications J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2005; 46(1): 75 - 88. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Koepfli, C. A. Wyss, M. Namdar, M. Klainguti, G. K. von Schulthess, T. F. Luscher, and P. A. Kaufmann {beta}-Adrenergic Blockade and Myocardial Perfusion in Coronary Artery Disease: Differential Effects in Stenotic Versus Remote Myocardial Segments J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2004; 45(10): 1626 - 1631. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |
