JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Treves, S. T.
Right arrow Articles by Fung, L. C.T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Treves, S. T.
Right arrow Articles by Fung, L. C.T.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 45 No. 3 508-511
© 2004 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Basic Science Investigations

Assessment of Rapid Changes in Renal Blood Flow with 191mIr, an Ultra-Short-Lived Radionuclide

S. Ted Treves, MD1, Alan B. Packard, PhD1 and Leo C.T. Fung, MD2

1 Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital Boston and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
2 Department of Urology, Children’s Hospital Boston and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

We investigated the feasibility of using 191mIr (half-life, 5 s) to measure rapid dynamic alterations in differential renal blood flow. Methods: A nonobstructive constant renal pelvic pressure model was used. The renal pelves of 6 New Zealand White rabbits were drained by use of bilateral catheters, and increased hydrostatic pressure was achieved by raising 1 catheter to 16, 25, 30, or 35 cm above the level of the renal pelvis. The contralateral kidney served as the control. 191mIr first-pass angiograms were obtained at baseline, after the induction of elevated pressure in the renal pelvis, and after the pressure was returned to normal. A minimum of 3 sequential angiograms were obtained at each point. Results: The differential blood flow values (mean ± SD) were 47.5% ± 7.3% at baseline, decreased to 42.3% ± 2.6% when the renal pelvic pressure was elevated (P = 0.001), and returned to 51.1% ± 4.0% after the pressure was returned to normal (P = 0.0017). There was no significant difference between baseline and postcompression values (P = 0.4807). Conclusion: It is possible to use 191mIr first-pass angiography to evaluate rapid dynamic changes in differential renal blood flow in an experimental animal model.

Key Words: 191mIr • 191Os • renal scintigraphy • animal models







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2004 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.