JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Halpern, B. S.
Right arrow Articles by Czernin, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Halpern, B. S.
Right arrow Articles by Czernin, J.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 45 No. 2 290-293
© 2004 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Brief Communications

Cardiac Pacemakers and Central Venous Lines Can Induce Focal Artifacts on CT-Corrected PET Images

Benjamin S. Halpern, MD, Magnus Dahlbom, PhD, Christian Waldherr, MD, Cecelia S. Yap, MS, Christiaan Schiepers, MD, PhD, Daniel H. Silverman, MD, PhD, Osman Ratib, MD, PhD and Johannes Czernin, MD

Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, Ahmanson Biological Imaging Clinic/Nuclear Medicine, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California

ABSTRACT

PET/CT imaging can be associated with focal artifactual 18F-FDG uptake introduced by metallic implants or contrast agents. It is unknown whether cardiac pacemakers or permanent central venous catheters can also result in such artifacts. Methods: Twenty-seven patients with permanent central venous lines (13 men and 14 women; mean age ± SD, 53.8 ± 16.2 y) and 9 patients with pacemakers (7 men and 2 women; mean age ± SD, 74.8 ± 5.1 y) who were referred for a variety of oncologic indications were studied with lutetium-oxyorthosilicate–based dual-slice PET/CT after injection of 7.77 MBq/kg of 18F-FDG. CT-corrected and -uncorrected PET images were reviewed, and 18F-FDG uptake was graded as absent, mild, moderate, or intense. Results: CT-corrected PET images revealed focally increased uptake of moderate intensity in all patients with cardiac pacemakers and focally increased uptake of mild intensity in 8 of 27 patients (29.6%) with central venous lines. Conclusion: Cardiac pacemakers and reservoirs of central venous lines can induce artifactual 18F-FDG on CT-corrected PET images. Thus, in patients with permanent central lines or pacemakers, both corrected and uncorrected PET images need to be reviewed to avoid false-positive PET findings.

Key Words: PET/CT • artifacts • pacemaker • central venous lines







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2004 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.