JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lerman, H.
Right arrow Articles by Even-Sapir, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lerman, H.
Right arrow Articles by Even-Sapir, E.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 45 No. 2 266-271
© 2004 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Clinical Investigations

Normal and Abnormal 18F-FDG Endometrial and Ovarian Uptake in Pre- and Postmenopausal Patients: Assessment by PET/CT

Hedva Lerman, MD1, Ur Metser, MD1, Dan Grisaru, MD, PhD2,3, Ami Fishman, MD3,4, Gennady Lievshitz, MD1 and Einat Even-Sapir, MD, PhD1,3

1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel
2 Department of Gynecology, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel
3 Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
4 Departmentof Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sapir Medical Center, Kfar Sava, Israel

The purpose of the study was to assess physiologic endometrial 18F-FDG uptake during the 4 phases of the menstrual cycle and to differentiate between physiologic and malignant endometrial uptake. Methods: Endometrial 18F-FDG uptake, expressed as standardized uptake value (SUV), was measured on PET/CT images of 285 consecutive female patients, of whom 246 (112 premenopausal and 134 postmenopausal) had no known gynecologic malignancy and 39 (14 premenopausal and 25 postmenopausal) had cervical, endometrial, or ovarian cancer. Results: Two peaks of increased endometrial 18F-FDG uptake were identified during the 4-phase cycle. The mean SUVs were 5 ± 3.2 and 3.7 ± 0.9 in menstruating and ovulating patients, respectively, and 2.6 ± 1.1 and 2.5 ± 1.1 in patients in the proliferative and secretory phases, respectively. The mean endometrial SUV in postmenopausal patients not receiving hormonal therapy was 1.7 ± 0.5. Oligomenorrhea and benign endometrial abnormalities were associated with increased 18F-FDG uptake. Neither contraceptives nor hormonal therapy was associated with a significant increase in endometrial uptake. In addition to the increased tumor uptake measured in patients with cervical cancer (14.9 ± 7.3 in postmenopausal patients and 12.2 ± 6.6 in premenopausal patients), increased uptake was also found in the adjacent endometrium, although it appeared normal on CT (4.8 ± 2 in premenopausal patients and 4.7 ± 2.8 in postmenopausal patients). Increased ovarian 18F-FDG uptake was detected in 7 patients with ovarian cancer (9.1 ± 4) and in 21 premenopausal patients without known ovarian malignancy (5.7 ± 1.5, P < 0.01), of whom 15 were at mid cycle and 3 reported oligomenorrhea. An ovarian SUV of 7.9 separated benign from malignant uptake with a sensitivity of 57% and a specificity of 95%. Conclusion: In premenopausal patients, normal endometrial uptake of 18F-FDG changes cyclically, increasing during the ovulatory and menstrual phases. Increased uptake in the endometrium adjacent to a cervical tumor does not necessarily reflect endometrial tumor invasion. Increased ovarian uptake in postmenopausal patients is associated with malignancy, whereas increased ovarian uptake may be functional in premenopausal patients.

Key Words: 18F-FDG • physiologic uptake • endometrium • cervical cancer • PET/CT




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
A. Shammas, R. Lim, and M. Charron
Pediatric FDG PET/CT: Physiologic Uptake, Normal Variants, and Benign Conditions
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2009; 29(5): 1467 - 1486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
J. K. Schwarz, P. W. Grigsby, F. Dehdashti, and D. Delbeke
The Role of 18F-FDG PET in Assessing Therapy Response in Cancer of the Cervix and Ovaries
J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2009; 50(Suppl_1): 64S - 73S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. Tsujikawa, Y. Yoshida, T. Mori, T. Kurokawa, Y. Fujibayashi, F. Kotsuji, and H. Okazawa
Uterine Tumors: Pathophysiologic Imaging with 16{alpha}-[18F]fluoro-17{beta}-estradiol and 18F Fluorodeoxyglucose PET--Initial Experience
Radiology, August 1, 2008; 248(2): 599 - 605.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
R. A. Milam, M. R. Milam, and R. B. Iyer
Detection of Early-Stage Ovarian Cancer by FDG-PET-CT in a Patient With BRCA2-Positive Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., December 10, 2007; 25(35): 5657 - 5658.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
S Basu, N Nair, and N S Baghel
A hypermetabolic abdominal focus in a case of osteogenic sarcoma on 18FDG-PET: in vivo insight into the gravid myometrial metabolism pattern
Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2007; 80(958): 851 - 852.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. A. Blake, A. Singh, B. N. Setty, J. Slattery, M. Kalra, M. M. Maher, D. V. Sahani, A. J. Fischman, and P. R. Mueller
Pearls and Pitfalls in Interpretation of Abdominal and Pelvic PET-CT
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2006; 26(5): 1335 - 1353.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
R Zissin, U Metser, H Lerman, G Lievshitz, T Safra, and E Even-Sapir
PET-CT findings in surgically transposed ovaries
Br. J. Radiol., February 1, 2006; 79(938): 110 - 115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. K. von Schulthess, H. C. Steinert, and T. F. Hany
Integrated PET/CT: Current Applications and Future Directions
Radiology, February 1, 2006; 238(2): 405 - 422.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. Sella, S. Mironov, and H. Hricak
Reply
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2006; 186(1): 268 - 268.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. Zissin and E. Even-Sapir
18F-FDG Uptake on PET/CT in Transposed Ovaries
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2006; 186(1): 267 - 268.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
N. Pandit-Taskar
Oncologic Imaging in Gynecologic Malignancies
J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2005; 46(11): 1842 - 1850.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. Ames, T. Blodgett, and C. Meltzer
18F-FDG Uptake in an Ovary Containing a Hemorrhagic Corpus Luteal Cyst: False-Positive PET/CT in a Patient with Cervical Carcinoma
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2005; 185(4): 1057 - 1059.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
N. Subhas, P. V. Patel, H. K. Pannu, H. A. Jacene, E. K. Fishman, and R. L. Wahl
Imaging of Pelvic Malignancies with In-Line FDG PET-CT: Case Examples and Common Pitfalls of FDG PET
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2005; 25(4): 1031 - 1043.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
K-C Ho, K-K Ng, T-C Yen, and H-H Chou
An ovary in luteal phase mimicking common iliac lymph node metastasis from a primary cutaneous peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumour as revealed by 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography
Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2005; 78(928): 343 - 345.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. Even-Sapir, Y. Parag, H. Lerman, M. Gutman, C. Levine, M. Rabau, A. Figer, and U. Metser
Detection of Recurrence in Patients with Rectal Cancer: PET/CT after Abdominoperineal or Anterior Resection
Radiology, September 1, 2004; 232(3): 815 - 822.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2004 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.