|
|
||||||||
Clinical Investigations |
1 PET Center, Groningen University Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands
2 Department of Surgical Oncology, Groningen University Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands
3 Department of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery, Groningen University Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands
4 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Groningen University Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands
The feasibility of 18F-3'-fluoro-3'-deoxy-L-thymidine PET (FLT PET) for detecting laryngeal cancer was investigated and compared with 18F-FDG PET. Methods: Eleven patients diagnosed with or strongly suspected of having recurrent laryngeal cancer and 10 patients with histologically proven primary laryngeal cancer underwent attenuation-corrected 18F-FLT PET imaging 60 min after injection of a median of 213 MBq (range, 175400 MBq) 18F-FLT and attenuation-corrected 18F-FDG PET imaging 90 min after injection of a median of 340 MBq (range, 165650 MBq) 18F-FDG. All patients were staged by endoscopy and CT according to the Union Internationale Contre la Cancer TNM staging system. All patients underwent biopsy of the laryngeal area after imaging. Lesions seen on 18F-FDG PET and 18F-FLT PET were compared with histopathologic results. Mean SUVs, maximum SUVs, and tumor-to-nontumor (TNT) ratios were calculated for 18F-FLT and 18F-FDG. Wilcoxon nonparametric testing was used for comparison of 18F-FDG with 18F-FLT uptake. The Spearman correlation coefficient was used to correlate mean SUVs, maximum SUVs, and TNT ratios of 18F-FDG PET and 18F-FLT PET. Two-tailed P values < 0.05 were considered significant. Results: 18F-FDG PET and 18F-FLT PET detected laryngeal cancer correctly in 15 of 17 patients. One lesion judged as positive on 18F-FDG PET turned out to be normal tissue. Of 2 lesions judged as positive on 18F-FLT PET, 1 turned out to be inflammation and the other to be normal tissue. Maximum SUVs were 3.3 (range, 1.98.5) for 18F-FDG and 1.6 (range, 1.05.7) for 18F-FLT (P < 0.001). Mean SUVs were 2.7 (range, 1.56.5) for 18F-FDG and 1.2 (range, 0.83.8) for 18F-FLT (P < 0.001). TNT was 1.9 (range, 1.34.7) for 18F-FDG and 1.5 (range, 1.13.5) for 18F-FLT (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The numbers of laryngeal cancers detected with 18F-FLT PET and 18F-FDG PET were equal. In laryngeal cancer, the uptake of 18F-FDG is higher than that of 18F-FLT.
Key Words: 18F-FLT 18F-FDG recurrent laryngeal cancer primary laryngeal cancer PET
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Menda, L. L. Boles Ponto, K. J. Dornfeld, T. J. Tewson, G. L. Watkins, M. K. Schultz, J. J. Sunderland, M. M. Graham, and J. M. Buatti Kinetic Analysis of 3'-Deoxy-3'-18F-Fluorothymidine (18F-FLT) in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Before and Early After Initiation of Chemoradiation Therapy J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2009; 50(7): 1028 - 1035. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Brepoels, S. Stroobants, G. Verhoef, T. De Groot, L. Mortelmans, and C. De Wolf-Peeters 18F-FDG and 18F-FLT Uptake Early After Cyclophosphamide and mTOR Inhibition in an Experimental Lymphoma Model J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2009; 50(7): 1102 - 1109. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. von Forstner, J.-H. Egberts, O. Ammerpohl, D. Niedzielska, R. Buchert, P. Mikecz, U. Schumacher, K. Peldschus, G. Adam, C. Pilarsky, et al. Gene Expression Patterns and Tumor Uptake of 18F-FDG, 18F-FLT, and 18F-FEC in PET/MRI of an Orthotopic Mouse Xenotransplantation Model of Pancreatic Cancer J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2008; 49(8): 1362 - 1370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Bading and A. F. Shields Imaging of Cell Proliferation: Status and Prospects J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2008; 49(Suppl_2): 64S - 80S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. G.C. Troost, W. V. Vogel, M. A.W. Merkx, P. J. Slootweg, H. A.M. Marres, W. J.M. Peeters, J. Bussink, A. J. van der Kogel, W. J.G. Oyen, and J. H.A.M. Kaanders 18F-FLT PET Does Not Discriminate Between Reactive and Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Primary Head and Neck Cancer Patients J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2007; 48(5): 726 - 735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Feng and A. Eisbruch Future Issues in Highly Conformal Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., March 10, 2007; 25(8): 1009 - 1013. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Agool, B. W. Schot, P. L. Jager, and E. Vellenga 18F-FLT PET in Hematologic Disorders: A Novel Technique to Analyze the Bone Marrow Compartment J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2006; 47(10): 1592 - 1598. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Yap, J. Czernin, M. C. Fishbein, R. B. Cameron, C. Schiepers, M. E. Phelps, and W. A. Weber Evaluation of Thoracic Tumors With 18F-Fluorothymidine and 18F- Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography. Chest, February 1, 2006; 129(2): 393 - 401. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Chen, T. Cloughesy, N. Kamdar, N. Satyamurthy, M. Bergsneider, L. Liau, P. Mischel, J. Czernin, M. E. Phelps, and D. H.S. Silverman Imaging Proliferation in Brain Tumors with 18F-FLT PET: Comparison with 18F-FDG J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2005; 46(6): 945 - 952. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. L. van Westreenen, D. C.P. Cobben, P. L. Jager, H. M. van Dullemen, J. Wesseling, P. H. Elsinga, and J. Th. Plukker Comparison of 18F-FLT PET and 18F-FDG PET in Esophageal Cancer J. Nucl. Med., March 1, 2005; 46(3): 400 - 404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Muzi, H. Vesselle, J. R. Grierson, D. A. Mankoff, R. A. Schmidt, L. Peterson, J. M. Wells, and K. A. Krohn Kinetic Analysis of 3'-Deoxy-3'-Fluorothymidine PET Studies: Validation Studies in Patients with Lung Cancer J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2005; 46(2): 274 - 282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |