JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Townsend, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, N. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Townsend, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, N. C.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 45 No. 1 (Suppl) 4S-14S
© 2004 by Society of Nuclear Medicine

PET/CT Today and Tomorrow

David W. Townsend, PhD, Jonathan P.J. Carney, PhD, Jeffrey T. Yap, PhD and Nathan C. Hall, MD, PhD

Departments of Medicine and Radiology, University of Tennessee Medical Center, Knoxville, Tennessee

Accurate anatomic localization of functional abnormalities seen with PET is known to be problematic. Even though nonspecific tracers such as 18F-FDG visualize certain normal anatomic structures, the spatial resolution is generally inadequate for localization of pathology. Combining PET with a high-resolution anatomic imaging modality such as CT can resolve the localization issue, as long as the images from the two modalities are accurately coregistered. However, software-based registration techniques have difficulty accounting for differences in patient positioning and involuntary movement of internal organs, often necessitating labor-intensive nonlinear mapping that may not converge to a satisfactory result. Acquiring both CT and PET images in the same scanner obviates the need for software registration and routinely provides accurately aligned images of anatomy and function in a single scan. Discussion: A CT scanner positioned in tandem with a PET scanner and with a common patient couch and operating console has recently been explored as a solution to anatomic and functional image registration. Axial translation of the couch between the two modalities enables both CT and PET data to be acquired during a single imaging session. In addition, the CT images can be used to generate noiseless attenuation correction factors for the PET emission data. By minimizing patient movement between the CT and PET scans, and after accounting for the axial separation of the two modalities, accurately registered anatomic and functional images can be obtained. Since the introduction of the first PET/CT prototype a little over 5 years ago, several thousand cancer patients have been scanned on combined PET/CT devices. In the past 3 years, a number of commercial designs have become available featuring multidetector spiral CT scanners and high-performance PET devices. Initial experience has demonstrated an increased level of accuracy and confidence in the interpretation of the combined study compared with separate readings, particularly in the ability to distinguish pathology from normal physiologic uptake and to precisely localize abnormal foci. Conclusion: Combined PET/CT scanners represent an important evolution in technology that is helping to bring molecular imaging to the forefront in cancer diagnosis, staging, and therapy monitoring.

Key Words: anatomic-functional imaging • PET/CT scanners • CT-based correction




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nucl. Med. Technol.Home page
S. Belakhlef, C. Church, A. Hays, R. Fraser, and S. Lakhanpal
Quantitative Assessment of the Influence of Location, Internal Temperature, Idle Time, and Normalization on the Sensitivity of a Mobile PET/CT Scanner
J. Nucl. Med. Technol., September 1, 2008; 36(3): 147 - 150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
B. J. Pichler, H. F. Wehrl, and M. S. Judenhofer
Latest Advances in Molecular Imaging Instrumentation
J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2008; 49(Suppl_2): 5S - 23S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
J. H. Kang and J.-K. Chung
Molecular-Genetic Imaging Based on Reporter Gene Expression
J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2008; 49(Suppl_2): 164S - 179S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nucl. Med. Technol.Home page
A. Belakhlef, C. Church, R. Fraser, and S. Lakhanpal
Sensitivity and Daily Quality Control of a Mobile PET/CT Scanner Operating in 3-Dimensional Mode
J. Nucl. Med. Technol., December 1, 2007; 35(4): 229 - 231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. S. Judenhofer, C. Catana, B. K. Swann, S. B. Siegel, W.-I. Jung, R. E. Nutt, S. R. Cherry, C. D. Claussen, and B. J. Pichler
PET/MR Images Acquired with a Compact MR-compatible PET Detector in a 7-T Magnet
Radiology, September 1, 2007; 244(3): 807 - 814.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc Am Thorac SocHome page
M. B. Dolovich and D. P. Schuster
Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography versus Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography: Tools for Imaging the Lung
Proceedings of the ATS, August 1, 2007; 4(4): 328 - 333.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
L. Burroni, C. D'Alessandria, and A. Signore
Diagnosis of Vascular Prosthesis Infection: PET or SPECT?
J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2007; 48(8): 1227 - 1229.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
A C Pfannenberg, P Aschoff, K Brechtel, M Muller, M Klein, R Bares, C D Claussen, and S M Eschmann
Value of contrast-enhanced multiphase CT in combined PET/CT protocols for oncological imaging
Br. J. Radiol., June 1, 2007; 80(954): 437 - 445.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
B. E. Lee, D. von Haag, T. Lown, D. Lau, R. Calhoun, and D. Follette
Advances in positron emission tomography technology have increased the need for surgical staging in non-small cell lung cancer
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2007; 133(3): 746 - 752.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
J. Czernin and H. R. Schelbert
Introduction
J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2007; 48(1_suppl): 2S - 3S.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
C. Catana, Y. Wu, M. S. Judenhofer, J. Qi, B. J. Pichler, and S. R. Cherry
Simultaneous Acquisition of Multislice PET and MR Images: Initial Results with a MR-Compatible PET Scanner
J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2006; 47(12): 1968 - 1976.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
P H Jarritt, K J Carson, A R Hounsell, and D Visvikis
The role of PET/CT scanning in radiotherapy planning
Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2006; 79(Special_Issue_1): S27 - S35.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
A. L. Kesner, M. Dahlbom, S.-C. Huang, W.-A. Hsueh, B. S. Pio, J. Czernin, M. Kreissl, H.-M. Wu, and D. H.S. Silverman
Semiautomated Analysis of Small-Animal PET Data
J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2006; 47(7): 1181 - 1186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
T. Z. Belhocine, A. M. Scott, E. Even-Sapir, J.-L. Urbain, and R. Essner
Role of Nuclear Medicine in the Management of Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma
J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2006; 47(6): 957 - 967.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
E. R. McVeigh
Emerging Imaging Techniques
Circ. Res., April 14, 2006; 98(7): 879 - 886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
V. Krishnasetty, A. J. Fischman, E. L. Halpern, and S. L. Aquino
Comparison of Alignment of Computer-registered Data Sets: Combined PET/CT versus Independent PET and CT of the Thorax
Radiology, November 1, 2005; 237(2): 635 - 639.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2004 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.