| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
2 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
Since its introduction in 1998, dual-modality PET/CT imaging has received great attention in the medical community. For the first time, patients can be examined with both CT and PET in a single examination. A whole-body survey is the standard mode of acquisition. The CT images are used for anatomic reference of the tracer uptake patterns imaged in PET, as well as for attenuation correction of the PET data. The routine use of CT-based attenuation correction and user preferences for the quality and type of the CT examination have led to the introduction of different PET/CT scanning protocols. Discussion: Two general approaches to PET/CT imaging can be distinguished today. One uses CT as a fast transmission source with little additional information for anatomic labeling. The other uses CT as a fast transmission source as well as a state-of-the-art diagnostic tool to maximize image quality using optimal acquisition parameters together with oral and intravenous contrast agents. Variations of these approaches share common concerns about image artifacts that result from mismatches in respiration and patient positioning between the CT and the PET examinations. Protocol requirements for the more complex radiologic PET/CT scenario also include alternative contrast application schemes or modifications to the attenuation correction procedure to handle CT contrast agents appropriately. Conclusion: High-quality PET/CT studies can be provided routinely with existing PET/CT technology that is used efficiently by trained and motivated technologists and physicians. Only then will the potential diagnostic benefit of this new imaging modality be explored fully.
Key Words: oncology • PET/CT • PET/CT imaging protocols • clinical oncology • combined PET/CT imaging
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. Belakhlef, C. Church, A. Hays, R. Fraser, and S. Lakhanpal Quantitative Assessment of the Influence of Location, Internal Temperature, Idle Time, and Normalization on the Sensitivity of a Mobile PET/CT Scanner J. Nucl. Med. Technol., September 1, 2008; 36(3): 147 - 150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Belakhlef, C. Church, R. Fraser, and S. Lakhanpal Sensitivity and Daily Quality Control of a Mobile PET/CT Scanner Operating in 3-Dimensional Mode J. Nucl. Med. Technol., December 1, 2007; 35(4): 229 - 231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. S. Judenhofer, C. Catana, B. K. Swann, S. B. Siegel, W.-I. Jung, R. E. Nutt, S. R. Cherry, C. D. Claussen, and B. J. Pichler PET/MR Images Acquired with a Compact MR-compatible PET Detector in a 7-T Magnet Radiology, September 1, 2007; 244(3): 807 - 814. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A C Pfannenberg, P Aschoff, K Brechtel, M Muller, M Klein, R Bares, C D Claussen, and S M Eschmann Value of contrast-enhanced multiphase CT in combined PET/CT protocols for oncological imaging Br. J. Radiol., June 1, 2007; 80(954): 437 - 445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. S.P. Meirelles, Y. E. Erdi, S. A. Nehmeh, O. D. Squire, S. M. Larson, J. L. Humm, and H. Schoder Deep-Inspiration Breath-Hold PET/CT: Clinical Findings with a New Technique for Detection and Characterization of Thoracic Lesions J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2007; 48(5): 712 - 719. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Czernin and H. R. Schelbert Introduction J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2007; 48(1_suppl): 2S - 3S. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. A. Weber and R. Figlin Monitoring Cancer Treatment with PET/CT: Does It Make a Difference? J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2007; 48(1_suppl): 36S - 44S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Kuehl, P. Veit, S. J. Rosenbaum, A. Bockisch, and G. Antoch Can PET/CT Replace Separate Diagnostic CT for Cancer Imaging? Optimizing CT Protocols for Imaging Cancers of the Chest and Abdomen J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2007; 48(1_suppl): 45S - 57S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Krishnasetty, A. J. Fischman, E. L. Halpern, and S. L. Aquino Comparison of Alignment of Computer-registered Data Sets: Combined PET/CT versus Independent PET and CT of the Thorax Radiology, November 1, 2005; 237(2): 635 - 639. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |
