HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JNM Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schaefer, W. M. Articles by Buell, U. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Schaefer, W. M. Articles by Buell, U.

Prone Versus Supine Patient Positioning During Gated ^99mTc-Sestamibi SPECT: Effect on Left Ventricular Volumes, Ejection Fraction, and Heart Rate

¹ Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
² Medical Clinic I (Cardiology), University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany

Gated myocardial perfusion SPECT allows assessment of left ventricular end-diastolic volume (EDV), left ventricular end-systolic volume (ESV), left ventricular stroke volume (SV), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Acquiring images with the patient both prone and supine is an approved method of identifying and reducing artifacts. Yet prone positioning alters physiologic conditions. This study investigated how prone versus supine patient positioning during gated SPECT affects EDV, ESV, SV, LVEF, and heart rate. Methods: Forty-eight patients scheduled for routine myocardial perfusion imaging were examined with gated ^99mTc-sestamibi SPECT (at rest) while positioned prone and supine (consecutively, in random order). All parameters for both acquisitions were calculated using the commercially available QGS algorithm. Results: Whereas EDV and SV were significantly lower (P < 0.0004) for prone acquisitions (EDV, 110.5 ± 39.1 mL; SV, 55.9 ± 13.3 mL) than for supine acquisitions (EDV, 116.9 ± 36.2 mL; SV, 61.0 ± 14.5 mL), ESV and LVEF did not differ significantly. Heart rate was significantly higher (P < 0.0001) during prone acquisitions (69.1 ± 10.5 min^–1) than during supine acquisitions (66.5 ± 10.0 min^–1). Conclusion: The observed position-dependent effect on EDV, SV, and heart rate might be explained by decreased arterial filling and increased sympathetic nerve activity. Hence, supine reference data should not be used to classify the results of prone acquisitions.

Key Words: gated SPECT • prone versus supine • left ventricular volumes • heart rate

Related articles in JNM:

THIS MONTH IN JNM

JNM 2004 45: 8a-9a. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. A. Rauen, M. B. F. Makic, and E. Bridges Evidence-Based Practice Habits: Transforming Research Into Bedside Practice Crit. Care Nurse, April 1, 2009; 29(2): 46 - 59. [Full Text] [PDF]