|
|
|||||||||
Clinical Investigations |
Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
The aim of this study was to characterize the biologic response of locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) to chemotherapy using 15O-waterderived blood flow measurements and 18F-FDGderived glucose metabolism rate parameters. Methods: Thirty-five LABC patients underwent PET with 15O-water and 18F-FDG before neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 2 mo after the initiation of treatment. Kinetic analysis for 15O-water was performed using a single tissue compartment model to calculate blood flow; a 2-tissue compartment model was used to estimate 18F-FDG rate parameters K1, k2, k3, and the flux constant, Ki. Correlations and ratios between blood flow and 18F-FDG rate parameters were calculated and compared with pathologic tumor response. Results: Although blood flow and 18F-FDG transport (K1) were correlated before chemotherapy, there was relatively poor correlation between blood flow and the phosphorylation constant (k3) or the overall 18F-FDG flux (Ki). Blood flow and 18F-FDG flux were more closely matched after chemotherapy, with changes in k3 accounting for the increased correlation. These findings were consistent with a decline in both the Ki/flow and k3/flow ratios with therapy. The ratio of 18F-FDG flux to transport (Ki/K1) after 2 mo of chemotherapy was predictive of ultimate response. Conclusion: The pattern of tumor glucose metabolism in LABC, as reflected by analysis of 18F-FDG rate parameters, changes after therapy, even in patients with modest clinical responses. This may indicate a change in tumor "metabolic phenotype" in response to treatment. A low ratio of glucose metabolism (reflected by Ki) to glucose delivery (reflected by K1 and blood flow) after therapy is associated with a favorable response. Further work is needed to understand the tumor biology underlying these findings.
Key Words: 18F-FDG 15O-water blood flow kinetic analysis breast cancer tumor biology response to therapy PET
Related articles in JNM:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. A. Mankoff, L. K. Dunnwald, S. C. Partridge, and J. M. Specht Blood Flow-Metabolism Mismatch: Good for the Tumor, Bad for the Patient Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2009; 15(17): 5294 - 5296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Lee, E. L. Rosen, and D. A. Mankoff The Role of Radiotracer Imaging in the Diagnosis and Management of Patients with Breast Cancer: Part 2--Response to Therapy, Other Indications, and Future Directions J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2009; 50(5): 738 - 748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Avril, S. Sassen, and R. Roylance Response to Therapy in Breast Cancer J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2009; 50(Suppl_1): 55S - 63S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Schwarz-Dose, M. Untch, R. Tiling, S. Sassen, S. Mahner, S. Kahlert, N. Harbeck, A. Lebeau, W. Brenner, M. Schwaiger, et al. Monitoring Primary Systemic Therapy of Large and Locally Advanced Breast Cancer by Using Sequential Positron Emission Tomography Imaging With [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose J. Clin. Oncol., February 1, 2009; 27(4): 535 - 541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Lodge, H. A. Jacene, R. Pili, and R. L. Wahl Reproducibility of Tumor Blood Flow Quantification with 15O-Water PET J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2008; 49(10): 1620 - 1627. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. K. Dunnwald, J. R. Gralow, G. K. Ellis, R. B. Livingston, H. M. Linden, J. M. Specht, R. K. Doot, T. J. Lawton, W. E. Barlow, B. F. Kurland, et al. Tumor Metabolism and Blood Flow Changes by Positron Emission Tomography: Relation to Survival in Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Breast Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., September 20, 2008; 26(27): 4449 - 4457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. A. Mullani, R. S. Herbst, R. G. O'Neil, K. L. Gould, B. J. Barron, and J. L. Abbruzzese Tumor Blood Flow Measured by PET Dynamic Imaging of First-Pass 18F-FDG Uptake: A Comparison with 15O-Labeled Water-Measured Blood Flow J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2008; 49(4): 517 - 523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Wolff, D. Berry, L. A. Carey, M. Colleoni, M. Dowsett, M. Ellis, J. E. Garber, D. Mankoff, S. Paik, L. Pusztai, et al. Research Issues Affecting Preoperative Systemic Therapy for Operable Breast Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2008; 26(5): 806 - 813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Mankoff, J. F. Eary, J. M. Link, M. Muzi, J. G. Rajendran, A. M. Spence, and K. A. Krohn Tumor-Specific Positron Emission Tomography Imaging in Patients: [18F] Fluorodeoxyglucose and Beyond Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2007; 13(12): 3460 - 3469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Soret, S. L. Bacharach, and I. Buvat Partial-Volume Effect in PET Tumor Imaging J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2007; 48(6): 932 - 945. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. K. Doot, L. K. Dunnwald, E. K. Schubert, M. Muzi, L. M. Peterson, P. E. Kinahan, B. F. Kurland, and D. A. Mankoff Dynamic and Static Approaches to Quantifying 18F-FDG Uptake for Measuring Cancer Response to Therapy, Including the Effect of Granulocyte CSF J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2007; 48(6): 920 - 925. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. M. Linden, K. A. Krohn, R. B. Livingston, and D. A. Mankoff Monitoring targeted therapy: is fluorodeoxylucose uptake a marker of early response? Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2006; 12(19): 5608 - 5610. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C M L West and N Charnley The potential of PET to increase understanding of the biological basis of tumour and normal tissue response to radiotherapy Br. J. Radiol., November 1, 2005; Supplement_28(1): 50 - 54. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | RSS | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |