JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JNM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wessels, B. W.
Right arrow Articles by Sgouros, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wessels, B. W.
Right arrow Articles by Sgouros, G.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 45 No. 10 1725-1733
© 2004 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Basic Science Investigations

Bone Marrow Dosimetry Using Blood-Based Models for Radiolabeled Antibody Therapy: A Multiinstitutional Comparison

Barry W. Wessels, PhD1, Wesley E. Bolch, PhD2, Lionel G. Bouchet, PhD3, Hazel B. Breitz, MD4, Gerald L. DeNardo, MD5, Ruby F. Meredith, MD, PhD6, Michael G. Stabin, PhD7 and George Sgouros, PhD8

1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
2 Department of Nuclear and Radiological Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
3 Z Med, Inc., Ashland, Massachusetts
4 NeoRX Corp., Seattle, Washington
5 Department of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California
6 Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama
7 Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
8 Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Medicine Institute, Baltimore, Maryland

Standardization of marrow dosimetry is of considerable importance when estimating dose–response for a multicentered clinical trial involving radionuclide therapy. However, it is only within the past five years that the intercomparison of marrow dosimetry results among separate clinical trials that use the same agent has become scientifically feasible. In this work, we have analyzed reported marrow dosimetry results from radioimmunotherapy trials and recalculated marrow absorbed doses at a central facility using a standard blood model with patient-specific source data. The basic approach used in the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM)/Sgouros marrow dosimetry methodology was common to calculation performed at all participating institutions, including the central facility. Differences in dose estimates associated with starting assumptions and the exact implementation of the AAPM/Sgouros calculation methodology used by the source institutions and the central facility were quantified and compared. Methods: Data from 22 patients enrolled in radiolabeled antibody clinical trials were randomly selected from 7 participating institutions for the assessment of marrow dose. The analysis was restricted to those patients who were treated with 131I- or 186Re-labeled antibody and had no marrow involvement. Calculation of bone marrow dose at each participating institution was unique to the trial or institution, but all used some form of the AAPM/Sgouros blood model approach. The central facility adopted a marrow dosimetry model based on the AAPM/Sgouros model for radiolabeled antibodies using the standard MIRD approach to the remainder-of-body contribution. A standardized approach to account for variations in patient mass was used for the remainder-of-body component. To simplify clinical implementation, regional marrow uptake and time-dependent changes in the marrow-to-blood concentration ratio were not included. Methods of formatting the collection of standard datasets useful in defining dose–response parameters are also presented. Results: Bone marrow doses were calculated according to the method described for each of the 22 patients based on the patient-specific data supplied by the participating institutions. These values were then individually compared with the marrow doses originally reported by each institution. Comparison of the two calculation methods was expressed as a ratio of the marrow doses for each patient. The mean ratio for the dose estimates at the participating institution calculation compared with the central laboratory value was 0.920 ± 0.259 (mean ± SD), with a range from 0.708 to 1.202. Conclusion: The independent use of the AAPM/Sgouros method blood model approach to marrow dosimetry has brought these dose estimates to within 30% of the results obtained centrally compared with substantially higher uncertainties reported previously. Variations in calculation methodology or initial assumptions adopted by individual institutions may still contribute significant uncertainty to dose estimates, even when the same data are used as a starting point for the calculation comparison shown here. A clinically relevant, standard method for marrow dosimetry for radiolabeled antibodies is proposed as a benchmark for intercomparison purposes. A parameter sensitivity analysis and a summary discussion of the use of this model for potentially improving dose–response data correlation are also presented.

Key Words: bone marrow • dosimetry • radionuclide therapy


Related articles in JNM:

THIS MONTH IN JNM

JNM 2004 45: 8A-9A. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
M. Cremonesi, M. Ferrari, C. M. Grana, A. Vanazzi, M. Stabin, M. Bartolomei, S. Papi, G. Prisco, G. Martinelli, G. Paganelli, et al.
High-Dose Radioimmunotherapy with 90Y-Ibritumomab Tiuxetan: Comparative Dosimetric Study for Tailored Treatment
J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2007; 48(11): 1871 - 1879.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
N. Petoussi-Henss, W. E. Bolch, M. Zankl, G. Sgouros, and B. Wessels
Patient-specific scaling of reference S-values for cross-organ radionuclide S-values: what is appropriate?
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, November 1, 2007; 127(1-4): 192 - 196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
J. A. Siegel, R. B. Sparks, R. M. Sharkey, B. W. Wessels, W. E. Bolch, L. G. Bouchet, H. B. Breitz, R. F. Meredith, G. Sgouros, and M. G. Stabin
Blood-Based Red Marrow Dosimetry: Where's the Beef?
J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2005; 46(8): 1404 - 1406.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
G. Sgouros
Dosimetry of Internal Emitters
J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2005; 46(1_suppl): 18S - 27S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2004 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.