JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JNM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Graf, S.
Right arrow Articles by Sochor, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Graf, S.
Right arrow Articles by Sochor, H.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 45 No. 10 1611-1618
© 2004 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Clinical Investigations

Electromechanical Properties of Perfusion/Metabolism Mismatch: Comparison of Nonfluoroscopic Electroanatomic Mapping with 18F-FDG PET

Senta Graf, MD1, Mariann Gyöngyösi, MD, PhD1, Aliasghar Khorsand, PhD1, Stephan G. Nekolla, PhD2, Christian Pirich, MD3, Kurt Kletter, MD3, Robert Dudczak, MD3, Dietmar Glogar, MD1, Gerold Porenta, MD, PhD1 and Heinz Sochor, MD1

1 Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
2 Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
3 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

The aim of this study was to compare nonfluoroscopic electroanatomic mapping (NOGA), SPECT perfusion imaging, and PET metabolic imaging for assessment of myocardial viability. In particular, we sought to elucidate differences of electromechanical properties between the perfusion/metabolism mismatch as an indicator of a potentially reversible ischemic injury and the perfusion/metabolism match indicating irreversibly damaged myocardial tissue. Methods: Twenty-one patients with coronary artery disease underwent NOGA mapping of endocardial unipolar voltage, cardiac 18F-FDG PET of glucose utilization, and resting 201Tl SPECT of myocardial perfusion. Results: Electrical activity was 10.8 ± 4.6 mV (mean ± SD) in normal myocardium and was unchanged in hypoperfused segments with maintained glucose metabolism (perfusion/metabolism mismatch), 9.3 ± 3.4 mV (P = not significant). In contrast, hypoperfused segments with a perfusion/metabolism match and nonviable segments showed significantly lower voltage (6.9 ± 3.1 mV, P < 0.0001 and 4.1 ± 1.1 mV, P < 0.0001 vs. normal). In hypoperfused segments, metabolic activity was more closely related to endocardial voltage than was myocardial perfusion (201Tl vs. voltage: r = 0.38, SEE = 3.2, P < 0.001; 18F-FDG PET vs. voltage: r = 0.6, SEE = 2.8, P < 0.0001). Conclusion: In hypoperfused myocardium, electrical activity by NOGA mapping is more closely related to PET metabolic activity than to SPECT myocardial perfusion. As NOGA mapping does not differentiate hypoperfused myocardium with enhanced glucose utilization from normal myocardium, results from NOGA mapping need to be correlated with results from perfusion imaging to identify hypoperfused, yet viable, myocardium and to stratify patients for revascularization procedures.

Key Words: myocardial metabolism • myocardial perfusion • nonfluoroscopic electroanatomic mapping • PET • coronary artery disease


Related articles in JNM:

THIS MONTH IN JNM

JNM 2004 45: 8A-9A. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. de Silva, L. F. Gutierrez, A. N. Raval, E. R. McVeigh, C. Ozturk, and R. J. Lederman
X-Ray Fused With Magnetic Resonance Imaging (XFM) to Target Endomyocardial Injections: Validation in a Swine Model of Myocardial Infarction
Circulation, November 28, 2006; 114(22): 2342 - 2350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2004 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.