JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME Activity
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kostakoglu, L.
Right arrow Articles by Goldsmith, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kostakoglu, L.
Right arrow Articles by Goldsmith, S. J.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 45 No. 1 56-68
© 2004 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Continuing Education

PET in the Assessment of Therapy Response in Patients with Carcinoma of the Head and Neck and of the Esophagus*

Lale Kostakoglu, MD and Stanley J. Goldsmith, MD

Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Medical College, Cornell University, New York, New York

In patients with carcinoma of the head and neck and of the esophagus, metabolic and functional imaging by PET with 18F-FDG has a pivotal role in the evaluation of tumor response to therapy, specifically, in the prediction of progression-free survival and overall survival. Metabolic imaging allows the detection of biochemical changes within tumor cells as opposed to identifiable morphologic changes. Anatomic imaging modalities do not reliably differentiate between responders and nonresponders early during the course of follow-up. The correlation between histopathologic tumor response after preoperative therapy and clinical prognosis is well established for many cancers. Squamous carcinoma of the head and neck and esophageal carcinoma demonstrate avid 18F-FDG uptake. For these cancers, 18F-FDG PET parallels histopathologic findings in its ability to detect residual viable tumor; therefore, it is a valuable tool for the noninvasive assessment of histopathologic tumor response in advanced-stage cases after neoadjuvant therapy before surgery. Early determination of nonresponders is of prime importance, as timely therapy modification can be accomplished for patients who do not demonstrate a response to therapy. This determination is exceptionally important for head and neck and esophageal malignancies, both of which are known for their unfavorable prognosis, as early modifications in therapy regimens for nonresponders may improve patient outcome. There is now evidence that 18F-FDG PET is a sensitive and specific method for determining therapy response and for providing important prognostic information for these cancers. Therefore, 18F-FDG PET may change patient management and lead to improved survival for a selected group of patients with carcinoma of the head and neck and of the esophagus.

Key Words: oncology • PET • PET/CT • 18F-FDG PET • esophageal carcinoma • head and neck carcinoma • response to therapy




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
H. Igaki, K. Nakagawa, K. Shiraishi, S. Shiina, N. Kokudo, A. Terahara, H. Yamashita, N. Sasano, M. Omata, and K. Ohtomo
Three-dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Inferior Vena Cava Invasion
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2008; 38(6): 438 - 444.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
J.M. Debnam, A.S. Garden, and L.E. Ginsberg
Benign Ulceration as a Manifestation of Soft Tissue Radiation Necrosis: Imaging Findings
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2008; 29(3): 558 - 562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
H. Lau, T. Phan, J. MacKinnon, and T. W. Matthews
Absence of Planned Neck Dissection for the N2-N3 Neck After Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, March 1, 2008; 134(3): 257 - 261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
M. Kawashima, H. Fujii, R. Hayashi, M. Tahara, K. Nasu, S. Arahira, and T. Ogino
Influence of Delayed Tumor Clearance on Reliability of Complete Response Rate in Chemoradiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., August 2, 2007; (2007) hym072v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
W. A. Weber
Use of PET for Monitoring Cancer Therapy and for Predicting Outcome
J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2005; 46(6): 983 - 995.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
V. Kapoor, M. B. Fukui, and B. M. McCook
Role of 18FFDG PET/CT in the Treatment of Head and Neck Cancers: Posttherapy Evaluation and Pitfalls
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2005; 184(2): 589 - 597.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. H. Thrall
Personalized Medicine
Radiology, June 1, 2004; 231(3): 613 - 616.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2004 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.